PLEASE USE A NAME WHEN COMMENTING

14 August 2019

UPDATE: COURT RULES ON SEPARATE SEATING IWL Creates a Religious Storm Over Concerts

UPDATE: COURT RULES
Moti Steinmetz WILL Sing And Afula Concert WILL Be Separate Seating
***
Israel Women’s Lobby (IWL) Aims to Prevent Orthodox Family Event in Haifa After Success in Cancelling Afula Concert

[this appears to *substantiate there is NO DEMOCRACY in Israel]

In the wake of a decision by the Nazareth District Court prohibiting gender separation at a strictly-Orthodox family event scheduled to be held at the Afula public park this week – and which was cancelled as a result – the Israel Women’s Lobby (IWL) who filed the petition to the court moved ahead Monday to demand a similar event likewise be prevented in the coastal city of Haifa, as well as the city of Bat-Yam.
  • "despite the ruling’s claim to the contrary, the government had never ruled against gender separation, saying that the 2013 decision cited by the court only established a special team to study the issue of gender separation, adding that its findings were never adopted."
The Women’s Lobby “demanded" that Haifa Mayor Einat Kalish Rotem and the legal counsel of the city ban a performance that was to be scheduled “for men only” at the Haifa Convention Center, saying that venue is a municipal building, and since the event would be held under municipal auspices, it cannot take place with gender separation. jewishpress
  • "Most synagogues are also in public buildings and the next step may be to prevent segregation in synagogues. If any gender separation is a criminal offense, then religious Jews cannot live their lives in the Jewish State, and that's what history calls religious persecution decrees.” (Ben Artzi)
Now, the Prime Minister should “wag his finger” at these unruly leftist women who want to interfere with a religious “men only” summertime concert. After all, they are attacking the Haredi voting bloc for the next election.

Do they want to attend the concert?
No, they just want to cause trouble with their discriminatory 
and anti-Jewish and anti-religious allegations.

The same law (if actually in effect), Basic Law: Human Dignity and Liberty, and the Prohibition of Discrimination in Products, Services and Entry into Entertainment and Public Places, 5761 (2000), should ALSO definitely protect against the discriminatory allegations of these disturbed women against entertainment created for a segment of the Israeli public.
  • The same law can be and should be applied v’nahafahu to their troubling and biased claims. The same law can protect the victims as well as the complainants.


* substantiate = provide evidence to support or prove the truth of

_____________________________

  • What about the statement by Betzalel Smotrich that there is no voted upon law?
  • The Shas Sephardic religious party filed a petition on Monday with the Nazareth district court against the Israeli Women’s Lobby (IWN) and also against the Afula Municipality for taking the position that it would respect the position of the court, calling the ruling unreasonable.

1 comment:

moshe said...

Firstly, to be honest, The State was never a real democracy (always a big tinge of bolshevikism), but there was a status quo where the frumme were left alone and little interference. Since the evil Oslo accords, things have deteriorated where now it gets worse on a daily basis. The sinah of the radicals (socialists, etc.) towards Torah Judaism has become full blown. They are determined to make Israel a country like all others, r'l, which is the complete opposite of what the Torah commands! We need to remember, Utza eitza v'sufar, dabru davar v'lo yakum, ki imanu Kel.

馃敟讛讬讬转讬 诪转驻诇诇 讘讘讬讛讻谞"住 转讬诪谞讬: 谞讚讬专, 讛诪谞讛讬讙 讛专讘 诇谞讚讜 注诇 讛讬住讟讜专讬讬转 讬讛讚讜转 转讬诪谉 讜讬诇讚讜转讜 讘诪讞讬爪转 讛转讬诪谞讬诐

  讘谞讬 讬砖讬讘转 讗讬转谉 讛转讜专讛 诇讘谞讬 讬讛讚讜转 转讬诪谉 讘讗诇注讚 谞讻谞住讜 讬讞讚 注诐 专讗砖讬 讛讬砖讬讘讛 诇诪讘讞谉 注诇 驻专拽 专讗砖讜谉 讘住讜讻讛, 讜诇拽讘诇转 讚注转 讛转讜专讛 诪诪谞讛讬讙 讛讚讜专 专讘讬谞讜 诪专谉 砖诇讬...