[me: what to keep in mind if you decide to vote in the coming elections:]
ANTI-RELIGIOUS COALITIONS
“And Korach the son of … took, along with Dasan and Aviram” (16:1)
Korach was very wealthy, whereas Dasan and Aviram were poor. In normal circumstances Korach would have deemed it beneath his dignity to associate with them, but for the sake of deprecating Moshe he was willing to join forces with them.
Rav Yonasan Eibeschutz explained Chazal’s statement that “Talmidei Chachamim increase peace in the world” (Brachos 64a) to mean that the talmid chacham acts as a catalyst causing those who hate religion to coalesce for the purpose of persecuting him. In our time too, we see anti-religious elements who have nothing in common other than an anti-Torah platform forming alliances against religious people.
KORACH'S MISTAKE
Korach, on the one hand, possessed Ruach Hakodesh: he saw that Shmuel was destined to descend from him. Moreover, he was genuinely convinced he was right in the dispute with Moshe. If it were otherwise, he would not have willingly consented to Moshe’s suggestion to be tested by bringing ketores. On the other hand, Chazal (Yerushalmi Sanhedrin Perek Chelek Chapter 1) say that Korach was an epikores. How can we understand this discrepancy?
Korach was indeed righteous, but he thought that instead of punctiliously observing mitzvos a person should rather focus on the rationales behind them. Thus, he asked Moshe, “Does a cloak made entirely of blue wool require tzitzis, or is it exempt?” Moshe replied, “It does require tzitzis.”
Korach and his associates laughed, saying, "Is it possible that in the case of a cloak made of another material, one string of blue wool exempts it, and this one, which is made entirely of blue wool, should not exempt itself?” (Rashi on 16:1).
Korach’s reasoning was that since the purpose of the mitzvah of t’cheles was to serve as a reminder of the Kisei Hakavod, it stood to reason that a tallis made entirely of t’cheles should automatically produce fear of heaven, and should therefore be exempt from tzitzis.
Similarly, when he asked “Is one obligated to affix a mezuzah to the entrance of a house full of seforim?” He meant to say that since the reason behind the mitzvah of mezuzah is to remind ourselves of Hashem at all times, in a house full of holy books we are in any case aware of Hashem’s Presence constantly.
This outlook was also responsible for his warped opinion regarding the appointment of Elizafan as nasi. Knowing that he himself was greater, he could not understand why he had not been appointed to the position of nasi.
Even though initially Korach was righteous and had good intentions, since he did not accept the yoke of Heaven upon himself to act in accordance with Hashem’s will, but only when it made sense to him based on the reasons for mitzvos, he deteriorated to the extent of fighting against Moshe and becoming an epikores.
TACTICS OF BAAlEI MACHLOKES
And they stood up before Moshe. (16:2)
People who have an agenda to generate machlokes are in the habit of displaying outward respect for the object of their dispute, thereby attempting to convince bystanders that they have nothing personal against him.
Here too, Korach and his allies made a point of standing up for Moshe to show that they respected him, but merely objected to Moshe’s appointment of Aharon HaKohen, who, they argued, was not as great as Moshe claimed, and therefore his appointment had merely been an act of nepotism. In other words, their main purpose in standing up was to make their humiliation of Aharon more palatable.
The worst type of lashon hara is when people start off praising the object of their scorn in order to cushion their subsequent slander. The Chazon Ish noted that we say in the Yom Kippur Katan prayer, “I was stringent regarding that which You are lenient about, and I was lenient regarding that which You are stringent about.”
In the first phrase, what is wrong with being stringent when we do not have to be? This refers to a person whose main motivation is to be lenient when he should be stringent (the second phrase), but in order to pretend that he is particular about mitzvos, he makes a point of being stringent when he does not have to be to “compensate” for his custom of being lenient when he should not be.
/ @gedoleihador 馃敂
讛讬住讟讜专讬讛 讘讘讬专转 讛转讜专讛 讛讗诪专讬拽讗讬转: 讗谞讜 诪讙讬砖讬诐 诇讻诐 讗转 讛拽诇讬驻 讛专砖诪讬 讜讛诪专讟讬讟 讛诪住讻诐 讗转 诪注诪讚 讛专讘讘讜转 讛讛讬住讟讜专讬 讘诇讬讬拽讜讜讚, 谞讬讜 讙'专讝讬, 诇诪注谉 讘讬爪讜专 "拽专谉 注讜诇诐 讛转讜专讛" 砖讘谞砖讬讗讜转 诪谞讛讬讙 讛讚讜专 诪专谉 讛讙专诪"讛 讛讬专砖 砖诇讬讟"讗.
诪讜诇 讛专讚讬驻讜转 讜讛讙讝讬专讜转 讛拽砖讜转 讘讗专抓 讬砖专讗诇, 注诪讚讛 讬讛讚讜转 讗专讛"讘 讻讗讬砖 讗讞讚 讘诇讘 讗讞讚 讘讞讬讘讜拽 讗讚讬专 诇注诪诇讬 讛转讜专讛. 爪驻讜 讘谞讞砖讜诇 讛讗谞讜砖讬, 讘砖讗讙转 讛"砖诪注 讬砖专讗诇" 砖讝注讝注讛 讗转 讗诪专讬拽讛, 讜讘专讙注讬 讛讛讜讚 砖诇 诪谞讛讬讙讬 讛讚讜专 砖讻讘砖讜 讗转 讛讬讘砖转.
A Historic Response to Persecution: The official and moving summary clip of the unprecedented mass gathering in Lakewood, New Jersey, for "Keren Olam HaTorah."
As the Torah world in Israel faces difficult challenges, tens of thousands in America united to show their unwavering support. Witness the incredible drone shots, the roar of faith that shook the continent, and the leadership of the giants of our generation
