PLEASE USE A NAME WHEN COMMENTING

01 March 2026

Trump, Purim and Iran

In this urgent and insightful session, investigative journalist Simcha Jacobovici reports from his bomb shelter in Israel to explore the deep, mystical, and political connections between the biblical story of Purim and the current geopolitical landscape. 

 In this video, we discuss: 
 馃敼 The Victory of Purim: A look back at the Jewish holiday celebrating the defeat of Haman in Persia (modern-day Iran) thousands of years ago. 馃敼 The "Hidden" God: Why the Book of Esther is the only book in the Bible that doesn’t mention God—and what that reveals about the "hidden" forces shaping our world. 
 馃敼 A Call to Action: Simcha draws parallels between the biblical King Ahasuerus and modern leaders like Donald Trump, urging a return to the decisive leadership seen in the story of Esther. 
 馃敼 The Amalek Connection: Understanding the ancestral enmity of the tribe of Amalek and its role in the recurring threat of genocide against the Jewish people. 
 馃敼 From Nuremberg to Today: The haunting link between the ten sons of Haman and the ten Nazi war criminals executed after the Holocaust. 

 As the sirens sound in the background, Simcha provides a unique perspective on why the Purim story is a prophetic blueprint for the events unfolding in the Middle East today.

 

Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer

Prophecy Unfolding: Downfall of Iran, Purim & The End Of Days - Rabbi Yitzchok Fingerer


I wrote in another post that I expected we would hear from Rabbi Fingerer, but then I erased it. Well, here he is with his analysis.

LIVE: Saudi Arabia To Launch WAR In Iran - IRGC Has MELTDOWN On Streets

 

馃摉诪诪注拽讬诐 拽专讗转讬讱 讛': 讝注拽转 讛转驻讬诇讛 讛诪专讟讬讟讛 诪诪专谉 驻讜讛"讚 讛专讘 讝讬诇讘专砖讟讬讬谉 砖诇讬讟"讗 讛爪讛专讬讬诐 讘讘讬转 诪讚专砖讜 专诪转 讗诇讞谞谉

 

INTERVIEWS IN BEIT SHEMESH

At least 9 killed in direct Iranian missile impact in Israel


Shocking footage from inside Israel during Iran’s missile attacks Air raid sirens are sounding across Jerusalem as missile interceptions continue, with plumes of smoke rising from interception sites and alerts sent to mobile devices. The situation has rapidly escalated from early warnings to a coordinated military operation by Israel and the United States against Iran. Residents report hearing explosions from intercepted missiles and the roar of fighter jets overhead, while smoke rises near sensitive and historic areas. The tense atmosphere underscores the growing regional crisis as military action unfolds.

WAR UPDATE: Something Happened in Beit Shemesh

Saw it on screen before computer froze! Very rare.
LIVE: Saudi Arabia To Launch WAR In Iran - IRGC Has MELTDOWN On Streets


An Iranian ballistic missile struck a residential area in Beit Shemesh, Israel, killing at least six people and injuring more than 20 others, according to Israeli emergency services. The missile impact caused significant destruction of homes and infrastructure west of Jerusalem as tensions escalate following a broader Israel-Iran confrontation.

FROM A SOURCE: Apparently eight homes were obliterated and people were killed in a public shelter.  The IDF promises to investigate what structurally went wrong, because obviously shelters are safe, not targets of the regime, and another layer of aluminum siding or whatever would have made all the difference.  As someone who knows his stuff explained it to me, it's not the missile impact that kills the people, so the structure has little to do with it.  But people don't know and don't want to know.

ILTV: Throughout the day, rocket barrages triggered sirens across Israel, striking cities including Tel Aviv and Bet Shemesh, killing at least nine people and injuring dozens more as search and rescue teams operate under a nationwide state of emergency, with airspace closed, tens of thousands of reservists called up, and the country now officially at war.


How US & Israeli Strike KILLED Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei

⚠️ This video is intended for educational and informational purposes. All information presented is sourced from verified international news outlets.


On the morning of February 28, 2026, the United States and Israel launched the largest combined military strike in modern Middle Eastern history — a coordinated aerial assault targeting Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the entire senior leadership of the Islamic Republic. Roughly 200 Israeli fighter jets struck over 500 targets across Iran while the U.S. military launched Operation Epic Fury, targeting Iran's nuclear infrastructure, ballistic missile sites, and IRGC installations. Khamenei's compound in downtown Tehran was hit with approximately 30 bombs, reducing the fortified complex to rubble. President Trump confirmed Khamenei's death on Truth Social, and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu declared the operation a success planned in close coordination with Washington for months. This video breaks down exactly how the strike was planned and executed — from the intelligence that confirmed Iran's top leadership had gathered in Tehran during Ramadan, to the deliberate decision to accelerate the timeline and strike in broad daylight on a Saturday morning, to the coordinated decapitation strike that killed over 40 senior regime figures including IRGC commanders, the defense minister, and the intelligence chief. We examine the years of Israeli intelligence penetration that made the operation possible, the collapse of Iran's Axis of Resistance proxy network, and the historic significance of the first assassination of a sitting head of state by Israel. Inside Iran, the reaction was deeply divided — state media broadcast mourning while ordinary Iranians celebrated in the streets of Tehran. With no successor named and the constitutional body unable to convene under ongoing airstrikes, the Islamic Republic faced its most existential crisis since the 1979 revolution. This is the full story of how the Supreme Leader of Iran was killed, and what it means for the future of the Middle East.

TEXT FROM ANOTHER ai VIDEO:
Iran fired missiles at seven countries in a single afternoon. Bahrain, Dubai, Qatar, Kuwait, Jordan all hit. U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters under attack for nine hours. Trump calls for regime change — "take over your government." Full Day One breakdown.
Twelve hours after the first strikes, Iran launched what the IRGC called the first wave of large-scale missile and drone attacks — and they did not just fire at Israel. Ballistic missiles struck American military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the UAE, and Jordan. Saudi Arabia and Iraq intercepted incoming fire. A hotel in Dubai is in flames. The headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet in Bahrain took direct hits and endured over nine hours of continuous attack. Military families were ordered to evacuate high-rise apartments in Manama. Seven countries under fire in one afternoon — a scope nobody predicted.
We now know two separate operations are running simultaneously. Israel's campaign is Operation Roaring Lion. The Pentagon's is Operation Epic Fury. Two sovereign militaries, two named operations, against the same country at the same time — something that has not happened since World War Two. Netanyahu placed a book about Allied coordination in WWII on his desk for the cameras. That was not an accident.
Western intelligence sources told the Washington Post that strikes on Iran's Ministry of Intelligence killed at least four top leaders including the heads of counterterrorism and counterintelligence. Israel targeted the defense minister and IRGC ground forces commander — both reportedly killed. Satellite imagery shows damage inside Khamenei's compound. Iran's own foreign minister said the Supreme Leader is alive — then added the words "as far as I know." The Iranian Red Crescent reports two hundred and one killed and seven hundred forty-seven wounded across twenty-four provinces. The strikes were not concentrated. They were nationwide.
Then came the words that changed everything. Trump told the Iranian people — bombs will be dropping everywhere, when we are finished, take over your government, it will be yours to take, this will probably be your only chance for generations. He offered the IRGC complete immunity if they lay down their weapons — or certain death if they do not. No American president has openly called for the overthrow of the Iranian government since 1979. This is no longer a strike. This is a war with a stated objective — regime change.
Vessel traffic through the Strait of Hormuz has dropped twenty to twenty-five percent. Four supertankers carrying eight million barrels turned around. The Houthis announced they will resume Red Sea attacks. When oil markets open Sunday night in Asia, expect chaos.

Recently Read Something Amazing About Amalek.....

 First I recommend this Sefer, which is a companion to appreciating the Uniqueness and Specialness, and Spirituality of the Land of Eretz Yisrael:

Places in the Parasha: Biblical Geography and its Meaning

About what I read, on the following pages:

If you are able to click & enlarge these pages, begin reading "What is the meaning of our eternal conflict with Amalek?

then continue on these two pages.

What captured my thoughts was this:

"Apparently, Amalek serves, in a way, as the nation of Israel's "evil twin." After this is a chronology of appearances of Amalek in the early history of the Israelites.

Then follows elaboration:
"Amalek is a figure that competes with us for our *identity and for our place – in our land, in the world, in history. The war with Amalek is more than just revenge; it is an act of defense – it is either us or them. We are commanded to blot out the memory of Amalek, but it is no less important for us to be able to distinguish between Israel and Amalek."

Also: "[...] It is almost difficult to avoid modern-day comparisons, and every generation has its own Amalek." (ed.) "When a nation **claims that it is the chosen race, while the Jews are an inferior nation that must be destroyed – when people claim claim that this land is not the Land of Israel, but a land with a different name, belonging to them – perhaps this is the essence of Amalek......"

This is what shines a floodlight on our struggles under the usurped leadership since the mid 19th Century, through 1948, up to and including the present.

And once again:

From Rav Moshe Sternbuch shlit"A:


"In every generation there are heretics who fight against Hashem and His Torah. Furthermore, Rav Moshe Cordovero wrote almost 500 years ago that the heads of government in the last generation before the coming of Moshiach will be from Amolek. 


Rav Chaim Brisker writes that the commandment to eradicate Amolek does not necessarily refer to the descendants of Amolek, but to anybody who espouses his atheistic philosophy.


 […] not to fear Iran or any eternal enemy We are only afraid of anti-Torah actions adopted by our coreligionists which cause sorrow to the Shechinah. 


Based on droshos by Maran HaGaon Rav Moshe Sternbuch shlita, Gaavad of Yerushalayim. To receive these weekly divrei Torah email ravsternbuchtorah@gmail.com


*  possibly a body of people who dominate the government of Israel.
** possibly a non-people non-nation that tries to usurp our identity and tries to eliminate Yehudim/Israelim from the face of the earth.











诪讛 转驻拽讬讚讬谞讜 讘讝诪谉 诪诇讞诪讛? 转讝讻讜专转: 讛讜专讗讜转 讛诪驻讜专讟讜转 诪诪谞讛讬讙 讛讚讜专 诪专谉 讛专讘 诇谞讚讜 讘诪讘爪注 注诐 讻诇讘讬讗

 



注讚 讞爪讬 讛诪诇讻讜转 - 诪诪讛 驻讞讚 讗讞砖讜专讜砖? ● 讛讗讝讬谞讜 诇砖讗诇转 谞讬谞讜 讛拽讟谉 砖诇 专砖讻讘讛"讙 诪专谉 砖专 讛转讜专讛 讝爪"诇, 讜转砖讜讘转 专讘讬谞讜 诇讬诇讚 讛拽讟谉.
诇讛诇谉 转诪诇讬诇 讛转讬注讜讚, (讛转讬注讜讚 讘讗讚讬讘讜转: 讗专讞讜转 讬讜砖专):
讛砖讜讗诇: 讻转讜讘 讘诪讙讬诇讛 砖讗讞砖讜讜专讜砖 讗诪专 注讚 讞爪讬 讛诪诇讻讜转 讜转注砖, 讗讘诇 讘驻注诐 讛专讗砖讜谞讛 讛讜讗 注讜讚 诇讗 讬讚注 砖讛讬讗 讬讛讜讚讬讛?
讛谞讻讚 诪住讘讬专 讗转 讛砖讗诇讛: 讛讜讗 讗讜诪专, 砖讻转讜讘 讘诪讙讬诇讛 砖讗讞砖讜讜专讜砖 讗诪专 诇讗住转专 讛诪诇讻讜转 注讚 讞爪讬 讛诪诇讻讜转, 讜讻转讜讘 讘诪驻专砖讬诐 诇诪讛 讞爪讬 讜诇讗 讛讻诇 讻讬 讛讜讗 驻讞讚 砖讛讬讗 转讘谞讛 讘讬转 讛诪拽讚砖, 讛讜讗 讗讜诪专 讛专讬 讘驻注诐 讛专讗砖讜谞讛 讛讜讗 诇讗 讬讚注 砖讛讬讗 讬讛讜讚讬讛 讗讝 诇诪讛 讛讜讗 驻讞讚?
专讘讬谞讜: 讛讜讗 讞砖讘 砖谞转谞讜 诇讛 讻住祝 讘砖讘讬诇 砖转讘拽砖 讗转 讝讛.  
讬讗专爪讬讬讟 讛专讘讬注讬 - 砖讜砖谉 驻讜专讬诐, 诪讻讬专讬诐 讟讜讘讛 诇专讘讬谞讜 讜诇讜诪讚讬诐 诇注"谞 讛讟讛讜专讛, 专讘讬谞讜 砖诪专讬讛讜 讬讜住祝 讞讬讬诐 讘谉 专讘讬谞讜 讬注拽讘 讬砖专讗诇

馃殌馃殧诪诇讞诪讛 讜专讚讬驻转 讛专砖讜讬讜转 - 讞讜讘转讬谞讜 讘砖注讛 讝讜! 诪讻转讘 讛诪谞讛讬讙 讛讙专"讚 诇谞讚讜 讗诇讬讜 讛爪讟专驻讜 讛讙专诪"讛 讛讬专砖 讜讛讙专"讚 住讙诇

 



诪讻转讘 注讜讝 讗讜讚讜转 讞讜讘转谞讜 讘砖注讛 讝讜 诇讗讞讘״讬 讬讜砖讘讬 讗专抓 讛拽讜讚砖 讜讘讻诇 讗转专 讜讗转专
讘注转 讻讝讗转 讗砖专 讛注诐 讛讬讜砖讘 讘爪讬讜谉 砖专讜讬 讘诪爪讘 诪诇讞诪讛 讜住讻谞讛 讙讚讜诇讛 讛״讬, 讜注讜讚 讝讗转 砖诪讻讘讬讚 注讜诇 专讚讬驻讜转 讛专砖讜讬讜转 注诇 讘谞讬 讛讬砖讬讘讜转 讜讛讻讜诇诇讬诐, 讞讜讘转谞讜 诇讛专讘讜转 讘转讜专讛 讜讘转驻讬诇讛 诇驻谞讬 讘讜专讗 讛注讜诇诐 砖讬注专讛 注诇讬谞讜 专讞诪讬诐 诪诪专讜诪讬诐 讜讬爪讬诇谞讜 诪讻诇 讛拽诪讬诐 注诇讬谞讜 讜讬专讗谞讜 谞驻诇讗讜转 讻讬诪讬 诪专讚讻讬 讜讗住转专.
讗讘讬谞讜 诪诇讻谞讜 讛驻专 注爪转 讗讜讬讘讬谞讜 讜讘讟诇 诪注诇讬谞讜 讻诇 讙讝专讜转 拽砖讜转.
讜注诇 讻谉 谞拽专讗讬诐 讘讝讛 讗讞讘״讬 诇讛转讻谞住 讘讛讬讻诇讬 讛讬砖讬讘讜转 讜讘转讬 讛讻谞住讬讜转 讘转注谞讬转 讗住转专 拽讜讚诐 转驻讬诇转 讛诪谞讞讛 讜诇拽专讜讗 转讛讬诇讬诐 驻专拽讬诐 讻״讘, 讬״讟 讜驻״讙 驻住讜拽 讘驻住讜拽 讜讗诪讬专转 拽诇 诪诇讱 讜讬״讙 诪讬讚讜转 砖诇 专讞诪讬诐. 讜讘砖诐 专讘讬谞讜 讛讞讝讜״讗 讝爪诇诇讛״讛 诪拽讜讘诇 讻讬 诪讝诪讜专 "讬讜砖讘 讘住转专" 诪住讜讙诇 讻谞讙讚 驻讙讝讬诐 讜驻爪爪讜转.
讬讛״专 诪诇驻谞讬 讗讘讬谞讜 砖讘砖诪讬诐 砖讬诪讛专 讙讗讜诇讛 讜讬讞讬砖 讬砖讜注讛 讜讬讜爪讬讗谞讜 诪爪专讛 诇专讜讜讞讛 砖砖讜谉 讜砖诪讞讛 讬砖讬讙讜 讜谞住讜 讬讙讜谉 讜讗谞讞讛.
讛讚讘专讬诐 诪转讜讱 拽讜 讛讞讬专讜诐: 03-313-3306

馃殌诪讬 诪讙谉 注诇 讛讗专抓 诪诪转拽驻讜转 讛讗讬专谞讬诐: 诪专谉 驻讜住拽 讛讚讜专 讛专讘 讝讬诇讘专砖讟讬讬谉 讘诪住专 诪专讙讬注 讬砖讜注讜转 诪讞讻讜转 诇谞讜

 


诪专谉 专讘讬谞讜 砖诇讬讟"讗 讬诪诪讛 诇驻谞讬 驻专讜抓 讛诪转拽驻讛 注诇 讗讬专讗谉: '转诇诪讬讚讬 讛讬砖讬讘讜转 诪讙讬谞讬诐 注诇 讻诇 讛注诐 | '讗讬谉 诇讛诐 砖讜诐 住讬讻讜讬, 讜专拽 讬砖讜注讜转 诪讞讻讜转 诇谞讜' |
讘诪住专 诪专讙讬注 讜诪注讜讚讚, 讗讜转讜 讛砖诪讬注 诪专谉 驻讜住拽 讛讚讜专 讛讙专"讬 讝讬诇讘专砖讟讬讬谉 砖诇讬讟"讗 讘砖讬注讜专讜 诇专讜驻讗讬诐 讘讬讜诐 讞诪讬砖讬 讛讗讞专讜谉, 讗诪专: '转讜砖讘讬 讘谞讬 讘专拽 诪讜讙谞讬诐, 讜讙诐 讘砖讗专 讛注专讬诐 讗讬谉 诪讛 诇讞砖讜砖' | 讛讗讝讬谞讜 诇讚讘专讬讜 诪转讜讱 拽讜 '砖讬讞 讬爪讞拽':
讘讬讜诐 讞诪讬砖讬 讛讗讞专讜谉, 驻专砖转 转爪讜讛, 住讬讬诐 诪专谉 专讘讬谞讜 砖诇讬讟"讗 讗转 砖讬注讜专讜 讛诪驻讜专住诐 诇专讜驻讗讬诐 讜诇专讘谞讬诐 讘讘讬讛"讞 '诪注讬讬谞讬 讛讬砖讜注讛', 讜讛转讬讬讞住 诇诪爪讘 讛讘讟讞讜谞讬 砖讛讬讛 诪转讜讞 讘诪讬讜讞讚, 诪讛 砖讛转讘专专 讻讬诪诪讛 诇驻谞讬 驻专讜抓 诪诇讞诪转 '砖讗讙转 讛讗专讬'. 诇讛诇谉 讚讘专讬讜 讛诪诇讗讬诐 砖诇 诪专谉, 讛诪砖专讬诐 专讜讙注 讜注讬讚讜讚, 讘注专讘 讬诪讬 讛驻讜专讬诐:

"诪讛 讬砖 诇讬 诇讛讙讬讚, 专讗砖讬转 讻诇 转讜砖讘讬 讘谞讬 讘专拽, 讗讬谉 诪讛 诇驻讞讚! 讙讬住转讬 讛专讘谞讬转 讘转 砖讘注 拽谞讬讘住拽讬 注"讛 拽诪讛 讘讗诪爪注 讛诇讬诇讛 讜讗诪专讛 诇讙讬住讬 诪专谉 砖专 讛转讜专讛 讛讙专"讞 拽谞讬讘住拽讬 讝爪"诇 砖谞驻诇讛 驻爪爪讛 讘讘谞讬 讘专拽. 讗讱 讛讜讗 讗诪专 诇讛: '讝讛 讟注讜转, 讝讛 诇讗 讘谞讬 讘专拽, 讜讗讻谉 谞诪爪讗 砖讝讛 谞驻诇 讻诪讛 诪讟专讬诐 讗讞专讬 讘谞讬 讘专拽. "转专讗讜 讬拽讬专讬讬, 讛讬讜诐 讘讬砖讬讘讜转 诇讜诪讚讬诐 诪讗讚 讟讜讘, 诪讗讚 诪讗讚 讟讜讘. 诇讬 谞讚诪讛 砖驻讛 讘讘"讘 诇讗 讬拽专讛 讻诇讜诐, 讜讗谞讬 诪讗讚 专讜爪讛 诇讘拽砖 砖讻讜诇谞讜 讬讞讚 谞拽讬讬诐 讗转 讛诪爪讜讛 砖诇 讗讛讘转 专注讬诐, 讜谞转驻诇诇 讙诐 注诇 讻诇 讗讞讬谞讜. 转讜砖讘讬 讘谞讬 讘专拽, 讗讬谉 诪讛 诇讚讘专, 讗谞讬 专拽 专讜爪讛 诇讘拽砖 诪讻讜诇诐 砖讬讞砖讘讜 注诇 讗讞讬诐 砖诇谞讜 砖讛诐 诇讗 转讜砖讘讬 讘谞讬 讘专拽". "诇讬 谞专讗讛 砖讗讬谉 诇讛诐 住讬讻讜讬, 讻讱 谞专讗讛 诇讬! 转专讗讜 讬讜砖讘讬诐 驻讛 讗谞砖讬诐 讜诪讚讘专讬诐 讘转讜专讛, 诇讗 诪讞诇拽讬诐 驻讛 砖讜拽讜诇讚..., 讜诇讗 住诪讬讻讛..., 专拽 讬讜砖讘讬诐 讜诇讜诪讚讬诐, 诪诪砖 转讜专讛 诇砖诪讛! "讗谞讬 讞讜砖讘 砖注诇 讘谞讬 讘专拽 讗讬谉 诪讛 诇讞砖讜砖 讘讻诇诇, 专拽 讗谞讬 讞讜砖讘 砖讙诐 砖讗专 讛注专讬诐 讗讬谉 诪讛 诇讞砖讜砖. 诪讚讜注? 转诇诪讬讚讬 讛讬砖讬讘讜转 讻讬讜诐 讙诐 注诐 诪讬讚讜转 讟讜讘讜转, 讛诪讜住专 砖诇讜诪讚讬诐 讘讬砖讬讘讜转, 讜讛讻诇, 讗诐 讝讛 讻讱, 讗谞讬 讞讜砖讘 砖讛诐 诪讙讬谞讬诐 注诇 讻诇 讛注诐, 讻讱 谞专讗讛 诇讬". 讜讻讗谉 讛驻转讬注 诪专谉 砖诇讬讟"讗 讜讗诪专: "诇讬 谞专讗讛 砖专拽 讬砖讜注讜转 诪讞讻讜转 诇谞讜. 讻讻讛 讗谞讬 讞讜砖讘". 讗讞讚 诪诪拽讜专讘讬讜 砖诇 专讘讬谞讜, 讗诪专 砖砖诪注 讘注爪诪讜 诪诪专谉 砖专 讛转讜专讛 讝爪"诇 诇讙讘讬 讛注讬专 '诪讜讚讬注讬谉 注讬诇讬转', 讻讬 拽专讬转 住驻专 讚讬谞讛 讻讘谞讬 讘专拽, 诪讗讞专 讜诪讚讜讘专 讘注讬专 砖讻讜诇诐 讘讛 诇讜诪讚讬 转讜专讛.
讗转 讚讘专讬讜 住讬讬诐 专讘讬谞讜 讘诪住专 诪专讙讬注 讜诪讞讝拽, 讜讗诪专: "讜讘讻谉, 讗谞讬 讞讜砖讘 砖讗谞讞谞讜 专拽 爪专讬讻讬诐 讻注转 诇讛专讘讜转 讗讛讘转 专注讬诐, 讜诇讗 谞专讗讛 诇讬 砖讬讛讬讛 讻讗谉 诪砖讛讜, 诇讬 谞专讗讛 砖砖讜诐 讚讘专 诇讗 讬讛讬讛 讻讗谉".

Just Heard Another "Sound" Overhead......

.......and then at least 2-3 minutes heard the "thump"! 
So a bit farther East landing from where I am.
Was not a jet, maybe something else?
Also not from the East, from another direction. 
Don't understand why not from the East? 
Who is sending these?

3/1 10:30 am


And the 'missile' that hit T.A., what was that trajectory (turkey)?

Tousi Celebrating…..

BREAKING: Iranians Out Celebrating The DEATH Of Khamenei

 

its been a remarkable series of reporting on the world scene and he deserves to be celebrating for his people!

IY”H………… BREAKING: Khamenei Confirmed KILLED - Iranians Begin Celebrations In Iran

 WE MUST GIVE GRATITUDE TO HKB”H FOR THIS HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT


Whatever is really going on, what matters only is that there will be a regime change in the world leading to the ultimate Geula in the timing of Hashem.  We need to see beyond the apparent and all reports that regardless of who and what we are seeing is Shefah min ha Shamayim! 

Yes I recognize both revealed and otherwise which just adds to the entire picture. And yes we need regime change in our dear Eretz Yisrael…….Mashiach we are anticipating your presence IY”H.

Purim 2026 - A New Purim Story, Ayatollah Khamenei has Fallen, Birthpangs of Moshiach

More info

 

Khamenei Eliminated on Shabbos Zachor!

 IY”H 


BOKER TOV MEOD! UPDATE

 UPDATE:  IY”H  IM SO HAPPY FOR THE PEOPLE OF PERSIA REGARDLESS….


Boker Tov I’m up very early these days. While in the kitchen, heard a siren, waited a minute, and then heard a “jet” fly over my head. It sounded heavy and was traveling mighty fast. It WAS COMING FROM THE WEST!?  In another min, I went to my east window and then heard the “thump”!

Funny, it landed nearly the same spot that the one last time fell around here! 
Why from the west! Think about that?

No, I don’t run like a chicken in fear. I don’t trust ………!
Besides I couldnt get anywhere that fast and in my robe!
I really didn’t feel fear, just curiosity!

Maybe it was a jet? one of ours? dropping a load?

PS. “News” says that Khm…… is no longer, but I suspect he was sent somewhere to retire! They gave him enough time (remember the stalling and all the phony discussions) to find a country willing to receive him. Could be? But we won’t know for a long time. And that doesn’t mean we have seen the last of Haman.

PSS aye eye is now controlling the spellchek. Very intuitive actions. Correcting and algorhytheming at same time. 




AISH KODESH: Nishmas HaChassidus (16)

 

Tetzaveh

27 February 2026

This is What I Heard Earlier This Week

CONFIRMED:  U.S. F-22’s ARRIVE - IN ISRAEL - A source in US Central Command confirmed that eleven of twelve F-22 fighter jets landed this afternoon at one of the air force bases in the south of the country as part of the US regional preparedness in the Middle East.  The 12th returned due to a refueling issue.(mystical paths 2/24)


I thought they were going out on a mission, but no they were coming in……

Reb Ginsbourg: Tetzave "Kindle the lamp in the Tent of Meeting"

"Kindle the lamp in the Tent of Meeting"

Hashem has no need for illumination, the mitzvah is solely for the honor and needs of Israel - and it also contains symbolism for daily life.

The preceding parsha - Parshat Terumah - the parsha of the command: ‘Make for Me a Sanctuary, so that I may dwell in your midst’ - concluded with the command to make the courtyard of the Sanctuary.

Our parsha - Parashat Tetzave, opens with the injunction to Moshe: ( 37:20-21)  ’Now you shall command Bnei Israel that they shall take for you pure, pressed olive oil for illumination, to kindle the lamp continually, in the Tent of Assembly, outside the partition that is near the Testimonial tablets, Aaron and his sons shall arrange it from evening until morning before Hashem, an eternal decree for their generations, from Bnei Israel.’

Abarbanel queries:’Why did Hashem command here, the arrangement of the lamps - should this not have been after the construction of the Sanctuary, and the placement of the Menorah and the other utensils in their places? - further, the priesthood had not yet been given to Aaron and his sons, so why were they commanded here as to the manner of their service, and the service that they would perform in kindling the lamps, which was part of their service.

‘This whole parsha was itself repeated in Parashat Emor, with the one change - here, it began with: ’Now you shall command, whereas there it said ( 24:1-2 ): ‘ And Hashem spoke to Moshe, saying:’Command Bnei Israel, and they shall take for you pure, pressed olive oil’ - there was its proper place and time, and it was therefore unnecessarily said in our parsha.’.

The sage answers the queries he raised:’From the style of the psukim, it would appear that they did not come here to command the acts, but the intention was to command the making of the priestly garments - this is why Hashem said to Moshe:’You shall command’, meaning: you are destined to command Bnei Israel at a future time, to take for you olive oil, and for it to be placed outside the partition, and that Aaron and his sons will arrange it there, as described in our parsha - as only kohanim are permitted to perform this service.

‘This is why our parsha continues:(28:1-2) And you bring near to you Aaron your brother and his sons with him, from amidst Bnei Israel to serve Me..and make for them holy garments, for honor and glory’ as it is not proper that they should come there in ordinary clothing, to perform their holy service - therefore, it is necessary for you, to ensure the making of the proper attire.

The words: ’Take for you’, alludes to the teaching of the Sages ( Menachot 86: ): Hashem did not need the illumination, but it was required for those who entered, to perform their holy service, to see before whom they was performing their service - as Moshe freely entered there at any time he wished, therefore it commanded that the oil be ‘pure, pressed olive oil’ - and therefore it said ‘for you’, meaning for ‘your benefit’, to enable you to see.

‘The Torah added:’to kindle the lamp continually’, which Rashi expounded as :’so that its flame would always burn’, the whole day and night, this being the meaning of ‘continually’.

‘However, our Sages expounded - in Midrash Sifra - that it referred to the western candle, which burnt at all times, and was never extinguished - and this is the view of Ramban - and it is the correct one.

‘In saying:’outside the partition’, it came to say, that it would be in the place of Assembly, where Moshe came to prophecy, or for Aaron, when he entered to kindle the incense or to kindle the lights, or to arrange the loaves on the Table or to perform his service on Yom Kippur - but not for any need of Hashem.

‘Hashem therefore commanded that it be ‘outside the partition’ - not before it, so that the kohen, when he came to kindle the candles, would not see from there the faces of the Cherubs.’

Rav Yosef Salant also comments, that:’Logically, the command to kindle the candles should have been written after the erection of the Sanctuary, and the menorah, that being its place, and not to ‘interrupt’ here, between the construction of the Sanctuary and its utensils AND the making of the holy garments - more so, as the commentators have pointed out, the proper place of this being in Parshat Emor, so why bring it here?

‘Further, in the concluding words:’An eternal decree for their generations, from Bnei Israel’ - what reason was there for the words:’from Bnei Israel’ - it would have sufficed if it merely said:’for their generations?

‘We can answer this, by looking at what was said (Menachot 102 ) as to the animal offerings:’a sweet smelling offering’ - and likewise in regard to other offerings, as long as your heart is to Hashem.

‘Should you say: He needs to eat’? did it not say ( Ps’ 50:12 )if I were hungry, I would not tell you, for the world is Mine, and the fullness thereof’., and all the beasts and cattle in it.

‘I did not tell you, to bring an animal offering, so that you would say: ‘We have done Your will, now do ours’ - you are not bringing the animal offerings to satisfy My will, but for your needs, so that, by fulfilling My mitzvah, you are obtaining atonement for your transgressions.

‘In the kindling of the Menorah and the lighting of its candles in the Sanctuary, we would not think that it is in any way for the benefit or need of Hashem, as the Gemara says: (Menachot 86:): ’And to its light, He has need? For forty years that Bnei Israel traveled in the desert, the only light was from Hashem’ - they all saw with their eyes, that He illuminated the way by His pillar of fire, every place where they camped or alighted.

‘Therefore, concludes the Gemara, it was as testimony to the world, that the Shechina resided in Israel - what was the testimony ? The western candle, which received the same amount of oil as the other candles, yet it was the first candle to be lit - and the one which concluded the lighting.

‘From that which Bnei Israel saw in the desert, they knew faithfully that there was no need for them to illuminate before Hashem, and that any lighting in the Sanctuary, was in the category of 讞讜拽讬诐: statutes the reason for which are beyond our understanding - if we ascribe to it reasons, they are only 爪讚讚讬讬诐 : ‘side thoughts’, be it that it was as testimony that the Shechina resided in their midst, or to elevate their image among the nations, to say:’Israel illuminate before the One by whose lights, the whole wotld is lit’ - but on no account could it cross our mind that Hashem needs Israel to provide light for Him in the Sanctuary.

‘However, in the future, generations who will enter the Land, and will not see the clouds of glory or the pillar of fire - the world behaving in its natural manner - so that they , too, will know the truth: that Hashem has no need for their illumination, and that the mitzvah is solely for the honor and needs of Israel - as it was at the time that that the clouds of glory illuminated for them.

‘This is why it said:’for your generations’ - meaning, the generations to come, this will be a statute the reason for which is beyond our understanding.

‘This is why it concluded with the words:’from Bnei Israel’, to say: that this matter of lighting the candles , and all that comes to Hashem from Bnei Israel - be it what they give to Him, or do for Him - are all in the nature of the lighting of these candles, that we cannot, Heaven forfend, think are for Hashem’s benefit - but are all for our benefit and honor.

‘For this reason, the Torah wrote this matter here, as He wanted to command Moshe here to draw Aaron and his sons from the midst of Bnei Israel, to appoint them to serve Hashem, and to make their attire for that lofty purpose, so that they would thereby then offer the offerings and offer the incence as ‘a sweet smelling offering to Hashem’ - so that it does not cross our minds that Hashem desires our offerings because He has a need for them.

‘Hashem therefore chose Aaron and his sons, and commanded that clothes of honor and glory be made for them - in which they would perform their service - and preceded this with the mitzvah of the lighting of the candles, as from this mitzvah no-one could think that it was necessary for the benefit of Hashem, to illuminate before Him.

‘From this all would learn that all of our service of Hashem - including the offerings - are only for the benefit and honor of Bnei Israel - a message for all generations of Bnei Israel.’

The Ohr Hachaim Hakadosh proffers another reason, as to why the Torah refers in our parsha:’for you’, Moshe.

He expounds:’The midrash relates that the mockers of the generation were casting aspersions om Moshe, saying: ’Could the Shechina really reside in something that Moshe constructed? there were even sceptics amongst Bnei Israel, as to this.

‘Even when the Shechina did reside in the Sanctuary on the First of Nissan, this - they contended - did not mean that it would reside there permanently.

‘However, the miracle of the western candle was testimony to the whole world, that the Shechina did reside in Israel - this is the meaning of ‘they will take for you’, meaning: this concerns you, as thereby your prophecy is vindicated , and is proven , by the Shechina dwelling ‘in your midst.’

The Kli Yakar brings our query - as well as others - and says:’To answer all these queries, Ramban provides an answer, thar what is said:’To kindle the lamp continually’ - refers to the western candle whiich was always lit, but the rest of the candles, were not - only from the evening till the morning.

‘From this, all of the queries can be answered - as after Hashem commanded Moshe to the Sanctuary and all its utensils, He divided the Sanctuary into three parts, on all of which he said:’And make for Me a Sanctuary, and I will dwell in your midst’.

‘The Parochet separated the Holy part from the Holy of Holies, and Moshe wanted that in each of the parts there should be something indicating that the Shechina dwelt in Israel - in the Holy of Holies, there were the Tablets of Testimony, which faithfully testified to the Shechina dwelling there, as they bore evidence of miracles, in the writing on them.

‘However, as the curtain separated them - and as no man was permitted to come there - lest the sceptics say: ‘One who wants to deceive, distances potential witnesses’, therefore Hashem was compelled to also provide in the Heichal the constant miracle of the western candle - so that all would look at it, and see from it, that the Shechina was there - which would not have been necessary, had the curtain not been there.

‘It therefore can be said, that this whole parsha is not intended to command as to the candles of the Menorah, as its proper place is in Parashat Emor - whereas here, the main command is as to the westtern candle, to instruct him that even though the curtain conceals the Tablets of Testimony, there is here also a sign by way of a constant miracle that Hashem dwells here - the western candle from which several other candles are lit, yet it itself is not depleted.

‘This is why the Torah gave a reason as to why this miracle was necessary:’because it stood outside the Parochet which covered the Tablets of Testimony - as the Parochet separated them place where the Tablets were located, and the rest of the Tent of Assembly.’

Rav Gedalia Schorr adds:’The objective of constructing the Sanctuary was to provide a place for the Shechina to dwell here below, as it had departed when Adam HaRishon transgressed - therefore Hashem commanded now:’Make for Me a Sanctuary, so that I may dwell in your midst’ - as was His wish at Creation.

‘The dwelling of the Shechina in the Sanctuary, was by 讗转注专讜转讗 讚诇注讬诇讛: ‘awakening from Above’, and after the Shechina rested amidst Bnei Israel, they were commanded to do their part - the part imposed on man, as had been the case with Adam before the sin, who was placed in the Garden ‘诇注讘讚讛 讜诇砖诪专讛: ‘to work it and to protect it’.

‘Our parsha details the service from the deeds of man - as Hashem yearns for the handiwork of man, and therefore the command as to the lighting of the Menorah by Aaron and his sons - Hashem leaving, as it were, at Creation, place for man’s deeds - proving that He yearned for them - and the midrash spells this out.

‘The parshiot of Terumah and Tetzave, respectively, are parshiot of the Written Torah - parshat Terumah - and the Oral Torah: parshat Tetzave.

Aaron Ha Kohen has a special connection to the Oral Torah, as the first occasion of the Oral Torah - in Parashat Ki Tissa - concerned an act - and exposition - of Aaron, and the first time a matter is written in the Torah, is a sign that it is the foundation and principal source of the matter - more so, as we read (Kings 2 ): ’The lips of the Kohen protect knowledge, and Torah they will ask from his mouth’.

‘As the Menorah alludes to the Oral Torah, it was apt that it should be Aaron and his sons, who were to light it.’

The Be’er Mayim Chaim similarly writes:’Whilst Hashem, in His infinite goodness, wants to bless us with all the choicest blessings, the awakening Above requires in all things, awakening down here, as this is the Divine’s rule in Creation - therefore, it was necessary that ‘Bnei israel’ - for their part, to receive the Divine blessings from Above - ‘take the pure olive oil’, and perform the mitzvot in the most honorable way, to give nachat ruach to the Creator - and He will then rain on them His blessings and chessed.’

A parting gem from Rav Moshe Feinstein:’The injunction that ‘Aaron and his sons shall set it up before Hashem’, before they were formally elevated to the priesthood, was becase the matter of the Menorah and what it comes to teach, applies to all who teach Torah, as the Menorah alludes to Torah, and it illuminates what is required to best educate children and to bring them to Torah and mitzvot - and the obligation of the teacher and the father in this holy work.

‘First, it is his obligation to light until it burns by itself, until the pupil able by himself to understand, and to grow.

‘Further, this requires that ‘the oil be pure’, free from any alien elements, so that he not be drawn to them.

‘Finally, the quantity of oil that to be used, is to be the same for each pupil, regardless of their ability, and not to assume that there is less need to pay attention to a seemingly more talented pupil - and, in the opposite case, of a less talented pupil.’

诇专驻讜讗转 谞讜注诐 注诇讬讝讛 讘转 讝讛讘讛 专讘拽讛 讜谞讞讜诐 讗诇讬诪诇讱 专驻讗诇 讘谉 讝讛讘讛 专讘拽讛, 讘转讜讱 砖讗专 讞讜诇讬 注诪谞讜.

Rabbi Freund: The price of misplaced mercy

There are moments in Jewish history when compassion becomes cruelty.

The Haftorah for Parshat Zachor, which we read on the Shabbat preceding Purim, is one such moment. The Haftorah (I Samuel 15:2-34 according to the Ashkenazi custom) recounts the dramatic episode of King Saul’s battle against Amalek. It is a passage that is as unsettling as it is instructive, as relevant as it is ancient.


The prophet Samuel conveys to Saul a clear and unequivocal Divine command: wage war against Amalek and destroy them and everything they possess. “Spare them not" (15:3) he is told. It is a mandate rooted in memory and morality alike, a response to Amalek’s unprovoked attack on the Israelites shortly after the Exodus from Egypt, when the Jewish people were weary and vulnerable.


And so King Saul goes to war. He defeats Amalek decisively. The Israelite army triumphs. Yet at the moment of victory, something shifts. Instead of fulfilling the command in full, Saul spares Agag, the Amalekite king. He also preserves the best of the sheep and cattle, ostensibly to offer them as sacrifices to G-d.


It sounds reasonable and humane. It sounds, perhaps, even noble.


But it was none of those things.


When Samuel confronts Saul, the prophet’s rebuke thunders across the generations: “Why did you not obey the voice of the Lord?" (15:19). Saul protests that the people took the spoils for sacrifice. Samuel’s response is unforgettable: “Does the Lord delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as much as in obedience to the voice of the Lord? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice" (15:22).


In that moment, Saul’s kingship begins to unravel. Not because he was cruel, but because he was soft where firmness was required. He allowed sentiment to override command.


And the consequences were catastrophic.


Jewish tradition teaches that among Agag’s descendants was Haman, the villain of the Purim story, who sought to annihilate the Jewish people centuries later. A single act of misplaced mercy reverberated through history.


But the Haftorah is not merely a historical account. It is also a mirror.


For decades, Israel has faced enemies who openly and proudly declare their genocidal intent. From Hamas to Hezbollah, the message has been chillingly consistent: the Jewish state must be eradicated.


Like Amalek, they do not seek coexistence. They seek destruction.


And yet, for far too long, Israel’s response oscillated between resolve and restraint, between clarity and concession. We have released convicted terrorists in lopsided prisoner exchanges. We have allowed incitement to flourish unchecked. We have hesitated at decisive moments, hoping that gestures of goodwill might temper implacable hatred.


Time and again, we have chosen to spare Agag.


To be sure, Israel is a moral nation, governed by law and animated by a deep respect for human life. Our soldiers operate under extraordinary ethical constraints. This moral sensitivity is a strength, not a weakness.


But morality divorced from realism is not righteousness. It is naivet茅.


Saul’s error was not that he cared. It was that he failed to recognize the nature of the foe before him. Amalek was not merely another adversary. Amalek represented an ideology of annihilation, a worldview that sanctified slaughter and targeted the defenseless.


The Haftorah reminds us that against such an enemy, half-measures are not humane. They are dangerous.


The October 7 massacre was a brutal reminder of this truth. Terrorists stormed Israeli communities, butchered families, burned homes and dragged hostages into captivity. They filmed their atrocities with pride. They reveled in bloodshed.


In the aftermath, there were voices urging Israeli restraint, warning against “disproportionate" responses, counseling caution lest Israel be judged harshly in the court of international opinion. Such voices are not new. They echo the instinct that led Saul to spare Agag.


But Parshat Zachor demands that we remember - not only what Amalek did, but what happens when we fail to confront Amalek decisively.


This does not mean abandoning our values. On the contrary, it means defending them. A state that cannot protect its citizens forfeits its most basic moral obligation. Mercy toward those who slaughter children is not compassion; it is injustice toward their victims.


Samuel ultimately executes Agag himself, declaring, “As your sword has made women childless, so shall your mother be childless among women" (15:33). It is a stark verse. Yet it underscores a profound reality: evil left intact will rise again.


The Jewish people have learned this lesson too many times, at too high a cost.


Parshat Zachor is read every year to sharpen memory. It reminds us that there are forces in the world that cannot be appeased, only defeated. It cautions us against the seductive appeal of misplaced mercy.


King Saul’s tragedy was not that he lacked courage. It was that he lacked clarity.


May we not repeat his mistake.




Trump, Purim and Iran

In this urgent and insightful session, investigative journalist Simcha Jacobovici reports from his bomb shelter in Israel to explore the dee...