PLEASE USE A NAME WHEN COMMENTING

12 June 2026

馃毃 砖讬拽讗讙讜 专讜注讚转! • 住讬讻讜诐 诪住注 讛讞讬专讜诐 讛讛讬住讟讜专讬 砖诇 讙讚讜诇讬 讬砖专讗诇 | Chicago Summary Video

 

The Temple Institute — Korach

 

You have gone too far, sons of Levi!"

(Numbers 16:7)

Sivan 27, 5786/June 12, 2026


"And Korach took." So begins this week's Torah reading, and so begins Korach's rebellion against the leadership of Moshe and Aharon, and against G-d, the Holy Blessed One, Himself, Who assigned Moshe and Aharon their roles as leaders of the children of Israel. The one word in Hebrew which opens up our parashah, "Vayikach - and he (Korach) took,"pretty much sums up the entire unhappy episode of Korach's attempt to wrest power from Moshe and Aharon. Korach sought to take, to grab, to seize control of the Israelite encampment. Korach was a taker, not a giver. He sought not to lead the people, but to rule over the people. But why?

Midrash tells us that Korach was fabulously wealthy. He lacked for nothing. He clearly was brilliant as we will learn by his method of seizing power. He was a Levi, a first cousin of Moshe and Aharon, and a son of Kehat, whose role in tending to the desert Tabernacle was the transport of its most holy and precious vessels, namely, the golden menorah, showbread table, incense altar and the Ark of the Covenant. Such a role demanded incredible responsibility and at the same time was a once in a lifetime privilege which most definitely came with an enviable amount of prestige. Who could ask for more? Korach could.

Perhaps it was the very privilege and honor of carrying the holy Ark across the barren wilderness that gnawed away at Korach's sense of self importance. Why am I doing the heavy lifting when my cousins Moshe and Aharon, certainly not my superiors, have all the glory?

Certainly Korach put much thought into his rebellion. Filled with resentment he realized that he could play the resentment card in order to incite and create a following. The sin of the spies had condemned the generation to forty years of wandering and ultimate death in the desert. Surely Moshe's leadership had ended in failure. Surely it was time for a new face at the top. Korach played the politics of grievances, and there was what to work with. Simmering grievances like those already raised about food and water, and now, being condemned to die in the wilderness, could be fed and stoked into a fiery rage. The fact that his chief followers were Datan and Aviram, both of the tribe of Reuven, show us that Korach was stirring up already ancient and forgotten history in order to create new grievances. Originally, the descendants of Reuven were destined to be the kohanim serving HaShem, as Reuven was the first born of Yaakov. This future role was already dismissed long ago by Yaakov, himself, who understood Reuven to be too unsteady and impulsive to take on such a responsibility. Yaakov's decision had never before provoked a peep of discontent from the children of Reuven, but now Korach is planting ideas in their minds. Magnifying grievances that had already been addressed, and creating new grievances that had never existed was Korach's play for power. And it very nearly succeeded. 

Moshe's initial response when being confronted by an angry mob was one of shock. “You take too much upon yourselves, for the entire community — all of them — are holy, and HaShem is in their midst. Why do you raise yourselves above HaShem’s assembly?”(Numbers 16:3) Who, least of all Moshe, could argue with such an eternal verity? Of course we are all holy, each one of us having been created in the image of G-d. And of course that makes us all equals. But all men being created equal does not mean that an angry mob should rule the people. And here is where Moshe put his foot down, threw down the gauntlet, and in a brilliant counter move to Korach's challenge, challenged Korach and his band to an incense offering competition, knowing that this would put the resolution of Korach's provocation in the hand of HaShem. Moshe, who never asked to be the savior and prophet of Israel, and at times longed to be relieved of the burden, knew that G-d could end Korach's insurrection in a manner much more convincing and final than Moshe ever could. 

The standoff grew more heated before it was ultimately resolved by an incontrovertible act of G-d: the unprecedented phenomenon of the earth literally opening its mouth and swallowing up Korach and his entire following. When Korach first opened up his mouth to spout alleged grievances he literally opened a can of worms, and now those worms were his closest neighbors.

But what would have happened had Korach succeeded in his attempted coup? How would he have led the people? No doubt with an iron fist and zero tolerance for dispute. His first victims would have been his erstwhile followers, namely the sons of Reuven. Having successfully used them to grab power they were now dispensable, a useless irritant to be discarded. And his talk about holiness and equality? Equality for Korach meant Korach at the top and every one else equally oppressed or ignored, at best. It also would have been the end of HaShem's  authority over the people. Having removed G-d's prophet meant breaching G-d's covenant with Israel. The Ten Commandments? Into the bonfire! Love your neighbor as yourself? For the losers! 

Korach may have been buried alive for all eternity, but Korach's playbook has remained the go-to guide for demagogues and would be dictators to our very day. The politics of grievances, the false sophistry of equity, the promise of free amenities for all, (except for those footing the bill), is all the fashion today. But all these ephemeral illusions quickly fade like mirages in the desert when the self appointed saviors finally grab hold of the reins of power. The one looming truth threatening their complete hold on power is G-d, and not just any god, but the G-d of Avraham, Yitzchak and Yaakov, the G-d of Israel and the G-d of the Torah and the Ten Commandments. Should today's Korachs, G-d forbid, ever gain the upper hand, the flood gates of chaos and anarchy will open. The utopia they promise will quickly become a dystopia.

"You have gone too far, sons of Levi!" Moshe told Korach. And it's a good thing Moshe understood this from the very start. For had he been blind to the ultimate consequences of Korach's rebellion, or had otherwise been complacent or asleep, it would have been too late. When G-d opened man's eyes to see and discern between good and evil, this was the moment. 

SONES: Korach’s Rebellion

 

Korach’s Rebellion and the *Epistemological Severance of Heaven and Earth

How Torah synthesis resolves the splits in philosophy, medicine, and faith—and the urgent, practical message for our generation

Parshas Korach wasn’t just a rebellion in the wilderness. It was the birth of a profound metaphysical split — one that severed the Tzaddik from the Lamdan, the living soul of Torah from its analytical structure.

Rebbe Nachman and Reb Noson trace this rupture all the way back to the angels who protested the creation of man. The same pattern later shaped Christianity’s cross, the Enlightenment’s analytic-synthetic divide, the mechanical model of modern medicine, and even today’s fractured Jewish discourse.

What if the cure has always been hiding in plain sight — in the unbreakable unity of Torah itself?

A deep exploration of how synthesis, not separation, can heal the splits in faith, philosophy, and our generation’s challenges.

Read the full article:

https://jewishhome.news/korachs-rebellion-and-the-epistemological-severance-of-heaven-and-earth/


"Epistemological" relates to epistemology, the branch of philosophy focused on the nature, origin, scope, and limits of human knowledge. In simple terms, it asks: How do we know what we know? It investigates the difference between mere belief, opinion, and absolute truth.

SONES: You Are a Terrorist.....

 Washington Just Labeled You a Terrorist

Your government may soon treat you as a terrorist — not because of anything you did, but because Washington decided it serves its interests:
The plan to brand communities in Judea and Samaria as terrorists is already in motion — and Israeli leadership is being handed the political tools to carry it out
https://jewishhome.news/washington-just-labeled-you-a-terrorist/

Rabbi Berl Wein – A Legacy In Film

Rabbi Wein introduces Rabbi Berl Wein:

 
NOSTALGIA
 Rabbi Berel Wein – A Legacy In Film As we mourn the loss of Rabbi Wein, I review his animated films that influenced me as a child. May his memory be a blessing. 
ANIMATED FILMS • Rashi: A Light After the Dark Ages • Rambam: The Story of Maimonides • Heaven and Earth: Stories of the Chassidic... THE MAKING OF RASHI https://www.jewishdestiny.com/destiny... OTHER VIDEOS TO GET TO KNOW HIM • Jewish History Crash Course • Advice For Yeshiva Students - Interview Wi... • The Myths & Truths About the Jewish People... • Rabbi Berel Wein Levaya CHAPTERS 0:00 Intro 2:36 His Life 4:46 His View of Jewish History 8:41 Rashi 16:02 The Making of "Rashi" 19:44 The Inkman 21:36 Rambam 25:53 Hasidic Masters 30:03 His Other Works

Jewish Lower East Side - history tour

 The dichotomy of then and now! America is now in post-diaspora memory, like Greece, Germany, Spain et al. 


 Memorable Comments:

My Maternal grandparents immigrated to the Lower East Side from the Ukraine...in the early 1900's. They did not come married. They came as teenagers ( I think) and met here later on. They talked about coming here a few family members at a time. They could not afford the whole family to come at once. My Grandmother said she took a letter in her pocket from her Mother with her and cried leaving her Mother behind. One by one they all saved enough money to get the whole family here. My mother was born in her grandmothers' bed....by a midwife....and even though times were hard......the stories that were told to me .....they seemed happy. No one complained. They lived in a tenement and had very little. Both my grandparents worked in the garment district....( the union label) and always made money. Everyone had large families....and got together for the holidays. My Mother remembers always getting new shoes for Passover and having Seder at her grandmothers tiny apartment.....with folding chairs and extra little tables for everyone to sit and eat. There was no drama and to me.....seemed like a simpler and kinder time. My Mother passed away a few years ago and I am glad to have all these stories from her. Always pictures on the rooftop of buildings (?) Sleeping on the fire-escape for relief from the heat.....and always talking about the foods. Kasha varnishkas....stuffed derma. ....kugels.....knishes....brisket....chopped liver....wow....and I also love it all. I wish my mother was alive to see this.....she would have brought back many happy memories for sure. Looking forward to more of these.....thanks for the memories !!!!!

Fascinating stories! My great-grandmother was born on Delancey Street in 1891 to Litvak immigrants from Latvia, while my other great-grandparents, fresh off the boat from Austrian Galicia (now Zhytomyr, Ukraine) were living on Rivington Street just two blocks from where Economy Candy is now, decades before their children would meet each other and become my grandparents. Thanks for bringing this neighborhood and era back to life!

nteresting to note that LaGuardia was born to a Jewish mother who hailed from the prestigious Luzzatto family (RaMChal)

Thanks for putting this together- I enjoyed it from so many different angles. 1. I was in Rabbi Kundas sleep away camp and got to hear those albums so many times. (Was there really a trolley that went from Henry St. to East Broadway?) 2. My grandmother was born in the Lower East Side (her grandfather was sent from Europe decades earlier to be a Rabbi). 3. My other grandmother grew up in Minkazc and was at the wedding where the Rabbi made the plea to American Jewry. 4. For many years I worked in Manhattan and got to live in the Lower East Side- retracing the footsteps of my ancestors. 5. Al from the Pickle Guys is the best. You need to actually taste his pickles to appreciate them. Here’s one interesting thing you missed- Bugsy Siegel used to pray in the Bialystoker Synagogue and still has a memorial plaque there. An elderly congregant told over that he and his friends grew up really poor but on the way home from school they’d stop by a candy store on 6th St. and drool at the candies inside. Every so often this well dressed guy would bring them all in, tell them to pick what they wanted and pay for it. It was only after Bugsy was murdered that they realized who the sponsor was.






Loving Hashem is Essence of Torah – TORAH on The Temple Mount

 



 

The Romans Are Moving in and Getting Cozier UPDATE

 Add this to the “Big Squeeze”

U.S. BUILDING GAZA BORDER BASE: Massive American Facility Rising Near Re’im As Trump Plan Moves Forward



*******

This is NOT the first such entrenchment! Trump once said (maybe?) no one can figure what’s going on in my head! However, we have a historical blueprint (Beis sheni) and we are following the script. He’s right on time! [Abraham Accords, Saudi Arabia, falistinians, Iran, nukes] Trump will bear-hug squeeze Bibi until he does what Trump wants. (…unless). His world domination ends only ONE way!

What does re’im mean?

In Hebrew, Re'im (专ֵ注ִ讬诐) translates to "friends" or "comrades". It is the plural form of the singular word Re'a (专ֵ注ַ), which means "friend" or "companion"

Think about the “Oct 7 wipeout” (let your imagine-nation get creative)

UPDATE

U.S. Military Aircraft Parking Crunch At Ben Gurion Could Threaten Millions Of Passenger Flights.  https://www.theyeshivaworld.com/news/israel-news/2561404/u-s-military-aircraft-parking-crunch-at-ben-gurion-could-threaten-millions-of-passenger-flights.html

11 June 2026

Rabbi Winston: Parashas Korach - Mevarchim (Tammuz)

 WE’VE PROBABLY ALL met someone like Korach in our lives, and come across Dasans and Avirams. If you’re a humble person, you might find yourself repulsed by them, and find yourself wondering, “Don’t they see what they look like? Don’t they hear what they sound like?”

If yes, then apparently it doesn’t bother them. They might even enjoy it, get “chizuk” from it. But that just makes the question even stronger, especially if they are Torah observant. If you don’t believe in God, or that He cares what we do down here, then it is easy to be “ga’vahdik,” overly proud. Some people prefer power more than friends. 

But if you believe in God and Torah, then it is hard not to know that God emphasizes the need to be humble. You can’t be arrogant and have fear of God, and fear of God is essential for being a “good” Torah Jew. You can’t be both even if you dress and act the part. God says so. 

So how could Korach be who he was, and Dasan and Aviram as well, and all those who fell in behind them? The question only becomes stronger if you factor in the Shechinah surrounding the Jewish camp, making God as real as it gets to a person. Even class troublemakers curb their troublemaking activities once the teacher returns to the classroom. 

If I said that I was humble I would not sound very humble. I’d like to think that I try to be, but I’m sure there are others who would disagree. But I do remember moments in my life when, for some reason, even I noticed my arrogance. But as bad as I might have felt, it was offset by an accompanying feeling of exhilaration. I know it was wrong and that I had to reign my ego in, but there was no denying this wonderful (but illusionary) sense of power and independence.

Perhaps it felt good because it compensated for some insecurity, which always feels empowering. Perhaps it validated my existence, which we all need to do from time to time. I don’t recall, but I do remember thinking, “Wow, I can see why some people don’t go back.”

Egotism can be addictive. Anything that the brain sees as pleasurable it takes note of and looks for more. Some people realize that the “more” is dangerous and talk themselves out of it. Others succumb to the temptation, maybe thinking “Just one more…” only to find themselves saying the same thing again and again until they pass the point of no return and the illicit pleasure becomes an addiction.

Many a big mistake started off as many smaller ones. That’s what the Gemora warns: A person sins once, twice, and then it becomes permissible to him. Permissible to him? Well, he acts as if it is permissible to him (Kiddushin 20a). Korach, Dasan, and Aviram, et al didn’t become arrogant overnight. This week’s parsha was the just the climax of years of working on it.

The point is, before you stand back and say, “I could never be a Korach,” think again. Lots of people have said the same thing and became one anyhow. If you have a yetzer hara, then you have the potential to be arrogant. Everyone usually is at one time or another. The question is, which people see it and course correct right away, and which ones do not? The earth may not open up for an arrogant person today like it did for Korach and company, but Gihenom will. And if not in this world, then certainly on the next one.

*   *   *

Series Two of the “Sha’ar HaGilgulim Course” will begin in two weeks, b”H. For more information or to register, go to: https://www.shaarnunproductions.org/Sha-ar-HaGilgulim-Course.html.

Have a great Shabbos,

Pinchas Winston


Eliezer Meir Saidel: Al HaPanim - Korach

 


Al HaPanim - Korach

讜ַ讬ִּ砖ְׁ诪ַ注 诪ֹ砖ֶׁ讛 讜ַ讬ִּ驻ֹּ诇 注ַ诇 驻ָּ谞ָ讬讜. (讘诪讚讘专 讟讝, )

 

When Korach and his eida rebelled against Moshe and Aharon, what was Moshe's response? The passuk says "Moshe heard and he fell on his face!"

 

What did Moshe "hear", and what does it mean he "fell on his face"? In addition, Korach's claim was against both Moshe and Aharon, so why was it only Moshe that heard and fell on his face and not Aharon?

 

R' Bachyei says that this shows the degree of humility and morality of Aharon HaKohen that although the claim was against him receiving the kehuna, he remained silent and did not respond – the same self-nullification before HKB"H we saw when his sons Nadav and Avihu perished after bringing an 讗ֵ砖ׁ 讝ָ专ָ讛, the passuk says 讜ַ讬ִּ讚ֹּ诐 讗ַ讛ֲ专ֹ谉 (讜讬拽专讗 , ). Moshe, however, saw the insult to his brother's honor and would not remain silent. Therefore, Moshe alone "fell on his face".   

 

The Gemara (住谞讛讚专讬谉 拽讬, ") brings a different explanation – 诪ָ讛 砖ְׁ诪讜ּ注ָ讛 砖ָׁ诪ַ注? 讗ָ诪ַ专 专ַ讘ִּ讬 砖ְׁ诪讜ּ讗ֵ诇 讘ַּ专 谞ַ讞ְ诪ָ谞ִ讬 " 讬讜ֹ谞ָ转ָ谉 砖ֶׁ讞ֲ砖ָׁ讚讜ּ讛讜ּ 诪ֵ讗ֵ砖ֶׁ转 讗ִ讬砖ׁ. What did Moshe hear? R' Shmuel bar Nachmani says in the name of R' Yonatan, they suspected Moshe of adultery. R' Shmuel bar Yitzchak continues in the Gemara to say, that as a result of this, all the married men in Am Yisrael warned their wives to not seclude themselves with Moshe and as a result Moshe withdrew and pitched his tent outside the camp (砖诪讜转 诇讙, ).

 

This slanderous lie had its roots at the end of parshat Behaalotcha. There we read how Eldad and Meidad were prophesying in the camp. The Sifri says that at the time, Miriam was standing next to Moshe's wife Tzipporah who said "I pity Eldad and Meidad's wives. Now that their husbands have become prophets, they will have to separate from them, as Moshe has done with me!" This was the first time Moshe's separation from Tzipporah became public knowledge - until then Moshe and Tzipporah kept it to themselves.

 

After Matan Torah HKB"H says to Moshe "Tell Bnei Yisrael to return to their 'tents' (return to their wives after separating from them during 砖ְׁ诇ֹ砖ֶׁ转 讬ְ诪ֵ讬 讛ַ讛ַ讙ְ讘ָּ诇ָ讛). But you Moshe 讜ְ讗ַ转ָּ讛 驻ֹּ讛 注ֲ诪ֹ讚 注ִ诪ָּ讚ִ讬, you remain here with Me!" (讚讘专讬诐 , 讻讜-讻讝). HKB"H told Moshe to separate from his wife in order that he would be in a constant state of purity so that whenever HKB"H wanted to communicate with Moshe, he would be available.

 

Miriam said "Separate from his wife!? But both Aharon and myself are prophets too and we have not separated from our spouses!" This is what led to the lashon hara of Miriam against Moshe at the end of parshat Behaalotcha.

 

Korach, who knew this (it was now public knowledge) instigated a slanderous lie against Moshe. "You all know that Moshe has separated from his wife. He is now alone and his yetzer hara must be having a field day. Who knows what shenanigans he gets up to behind closed doors. If I were you - I would keep a close watch on your wives!"

 

This is what typified Korach's machloket and made it illegitimate, it was not about principles, it was personal (see shiur on Korach 2021). Korach performed a targeted character assassination against Moshe, but in a devious, surreptitious way. He didn't come straight out and say "Moshe is committing adultery", he sowed the seeds of doubt. Korach would never dream of accusing Aharon of adultery, he knew how the people loved Aharon and this lie would fall flat.

 

This is why it was only Moshe and not Aharon who "heard", because it was a lie against Moshe specifically. When Moshe "heard this", 讜ַ讬ִּ砖ְׁ诪ַ注 诪ֹ砖ֶׁ讛, he understood that Korach was not salvageable (unlike Datan and Aviram, who Moshe still tried to save). When someone has that degree of hate for you that they will not balk at crossing any red line just to eliminate you, when they have reached that stage - there is no way to appease them. It is a binary situation – you or them!

 

So, Moshe "fell on his face" 讜ַ讬ִּ驻ֹּ诇 注ַ诇 驻ָּ谞ָ讬讜. What does this mean? The Rashbam (ibid.) says that Moshe fell on his face - in prayer. So why does the passuk not say that Moshe prayed? Like when he prayed to HKB"H to cure Miriam from leprosy, the passuk says 讜ַ讬ִּ爪ְ注ַ拽 诪ֹ砖ֶׁ讛 讗ֶ诇 '. This is obviously a different kind of "prayer".

 

R' Bachyei (ibid.) says 讜ְ讗讜ּ诇ַ讬 讘ִּ谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 讝ֶ讛 讛ֶ注ֱ谞ִ讬砖ׁ 诪ֹ砖ֶׁ讛 诇ְ拽ֹ专ַ讞 讜ּ诇ְ讻ָ诇 注ֲ讚ָ转讜ֹ, this was not a prayer for salvation, but for retribution – Moshe was asking HKB"H to punish Korach and his eida. R' Bachyei then connects this instance with a Gemara that describes a similar incident between R' Eliezer and Raban Gamliel.

 

The Gemara (讘讘讗 诪爪讬注讗 谞讟, ") discusses whether a "Tanur Achnai", a certain kind of oven, is permissible or not (see shiur on  Kedoshim 2022). In the debate, the majority of the Chachamim, headed by R' Yehoshua, ruled that such an oven is 讟ָ诪ֵ讗, against the opinion of R' Eliezer that such an oven is 讟ָ讛讜ֹ专.

 

It is a very picturesque Gemara with R' Eliezer trying to prove his point, despite the rabbinic majority ruling, using multiple supernatural miracles. Despite these, R' Yehoshua retorted "I am sorry, but we are the majority and the Torah says 讗ַ讞ֲ专ֵ讬 专ַ讘ִּ讬诐 诇ְ讛ַ讟ֹּ转 (砖诪讜转 讻讙, ). Miracles do not affect our decision!"

 

R' Eliezer refused to accept the majority decision of the Chachamim and continued to teach that such an oven is 讟ָ讛讜ֹ专. The nasi of the Chachamim at the time, Raban Gamliel, had no choice but to put R' Eliezer in 讞ֵ专ֶ诐.

 

They sent R' Akiva, who was R' Eliezer's favorite student, to inform him. Needless to say, R' Eliezer took this very badly and lived the rest of his life in 讞ֵ专ֶ诐 and in anguish. We get a hint to this from R' Eliezer's admonition in Pirkei Avot (2, 10) - 讜ֶ讛ֱ讜ֵ讬 诪ִ转ְ讞ַ诪ֵּ诐 讻ְּ谞ֶ讙ֶ讚 讗讜ּ专ָ谉 砖ֶׁ诇 讞ֲ讻ָ诪ִ讬诐, 讜ֶ讛ֱ讜ֵ讬 讝ָ讛ִ讬专 讘ְּ讙ַ讞ַ诇ְ转ָּ谉 砖ֶׁ诇ֹּ讗 转ִּ讻ָּ讜ֶ讛, 砖ֶׁ谞ְּ砖ִׁ讬讻ָ转ָ谉 谞ְ砖ִׁ讬讻ַ转 砖ׁ讜ּ注ָ诇, 讜ַ注ֲ拽ִ讬爪ָ转ָ谉 注ֲ拽ִ讬爪ַ转 注ַ拽ְ专ָ讘, 讜ּ诇ְ讞ִ讬砖ָׁ转ָ谉 诇ְ讞ִ讬砖ַׁ转 砖ָׂ专ָ祝, 讜ְ讻ָ诇 讚ִּ讘ְ专ֵ讬讛ֶ诐 讻ְּ讙ַ讞ֲ诇ֵ讬 讗ֵ砖ׁ, which is tinged with unmistakable bitterness.

 

R' Eliezer was married to Raban Gamliel's sister. The Gemara says that she was always vigilant in preventing her husband R' Eliezer from doing 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐. She knew that if R' Eliezer would do 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 and pour out his heart, it would not bode well for her brother, the nasi Raban Gamliel who had put out the 讞ֵ专ֶ诐.

 

One day some mishap occurred and she did not prevent R' Eliezer from doing 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐. Later that day she heard a shofar blast announcing that Raban Gamliel had died. When they asked how she knew this would happen, she replied "I learned this from my grandfather. All the gates of Heaven are locked, except for someone who was caused grief by others".

 

There is something unique about the prayer of 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 that is different to other types of prayer - it breaks through all the barriers and goes directly to HKB"H in Heaven. It was this same kind of prayer that Moshe offers in our parsha 讜ַ讬ִּ驻ֹּ诇 注ַ诇 驻ָּ谞ָ讬讜, which, as we know, ended up in the horrific demise of Korach and his eida.

 

When Moshe did 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐, it meant that he fully prostrated himself on the ground, face downwards. This is the same kind of 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐, or 讛ִ砖ְׁ转ַּ讞ֲ讜ָ讬ָ讛, that the Kohanim do when they are doing avodah in the Beit HaMikdash. It involves spreadeagling yourself, face down on the ground.

 

This kind of 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 outside the Beit HaMikdash is forbidden, for the fear of 讗ֶ讘ֶ谉 诪ַ砖ְׂ讻ִּ讬转, prostrating directly on a stone floor, like idol worshippers did. It is permissible inside the Beit HaMikdash, because this is holy ground and can never be misconstrued for idol worship. However, outside the Beit HaMikdash, if someone prostrates themselves, there is a 讞ֲ砖ָׁ砖ׁ of 诪ַ专ְ讗ִ讬转 注ַ讬ִ谉.

 

Even on Yom Kippur when we do 讛ִ砖ְׁ转ַּ讞ֲ讜ָ讬ָ讛, it is not full-fledged prostration on the ground and we are makpid to not do it directly on the floor, but separated by a towel or another piece of cloth.

 

What is it about 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 (which we also refer to as Tachanun) that encompasses such power?

 

谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 is total self-nullification and mesirut nefesh to HKB"H. By lowering yourself to the ground and making your face "not seen", you are in essence minimizing yourself completely before G-d.

 

The Zohar (讝讛专 " 拽讻,) draws a connection between going to sleep at night and doing 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 during the day. At night we prostrate ourselves and lay our heads down (equivalent to 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐), depositing our neshama with HKB"H.

 

For this reason, we should not sleep 驻ַּ专ְ拽ְ讚ָ谉, with our heads facing upward (砖讜" 讗讘谉 讛注讝专 住讬诪谉 讻讙 " ), because this is a sign of 讙ַּ讗ֲ讜ָ讛, the opposite of 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐, where the face is facing downwards (Obviously sleeping face downwards involves the danger of suffocation, so the Shulchan Aruch tells us to sleep on our sides).

 

Sleeping is an act of total 讛ִ转ְ讘ַּ讟ְּ诇讜ּ转 and 诪ְ住ִ讬专讜ּ转 谞ֶ驻ֶ砖ׁ - ultimate trust in HKB"H to guard over our neshama while we are asleep. This is the 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 of the night and is the reason we don't do 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 during tefilat Arvit in shul, because we perform it de facto while we sleep.

 

We repeat this again in the morning with 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 during Shacharit and in the afternoon during Mincha.

 

By doing so at the three major intervals of the day, morning, noon and night, we are in constant nullification of our self before HKB"H every day of our lives, the entire day!

 

Why is it then that on certain days we do not do 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 during the day? On Shabbatot, Chagim, Rosh Chodesh (also on erev-), in the house of a mourner, etc. The answer is that self-nullification is achievable in other ways too. Through simcha/joy, by experiencing a feeling of true simcha, we are in fact exhibiting total 讛ִ转ְ讘ַּ讟ְּ诇讜ּ转 before HKB"H, that we are totally 砖ָׂ诪ֵ讞ַ 讘ְּ讞ֶ诇ְ拽ֵ谞讜ּ and have no 讟ְ注ָ谞讜ֹ转 against Him chas veshalom. When Avraham was told about the birth of Yitzchak the passuk says 讜ַ讬ִּ驻ֹּ诇 讗ַ讘ְ专ָ讛ָ诐 注ַ诇 驻ָּ谞ָ讬讜 讜ַ讬ִּ爪ְ讞ָ拽 (讘专讗砖讬转 讬讝, 讬讝). Days of true simcha are Shabbatot, Chagim and Rosh Chodesh. Being in the house of a mourner confronts us with our own mortality and elicits self-nullification. These are all conscious behavioral patterns, which is why they replace the 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 of the day, but even on these special days and circumstances, we still need the 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 of the night, because during that time we are unconscious.

 

The modern 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 is drastically different in physical posture to the original 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐. Today, we simply lean our head to the side and rest it on our weaker forearm. During Shacharit when we have tefillin on that arm, we do 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 on the arm that does not have the tefillin, to not disrespect the tefillin. The Magen Avraham and the Mishna Brura (讗讜" 住讬诪谉 拽诇讗, " ) say that the arm should be covered by some form of 讞ֲ爪ִ讬爪ָ讛, your shirt sleeve, a tallit, etc. Your head should not rest directly on your exposed arm, without any 讞ֲ爪ִ讬爪ָ讛 - a throwback to the 讞ֲ砖ָׁ砖ׁ of 讗ֶ讘ֶ谉 诪ַ砖ְׂ讻ִּ讬转 - to make a break between your head and the ground. Your exposed arm is not considered a break because 诪ִ讬谉 讘ְּ诪ִ讬谞讜ֹ 讗ֵ讬谉 讞讜ֹ爪ֵ抓. Opinions differ whether one should bend over if not in shul in the presence of a sefer Torah. Some opinions say that you may bend over in a Beit Midrash with lots of sifrei kodesh, which are equivalent to a sefer Torah.  Some opinions say that being physically located in the city of Jerusalem is sufficient to warrant bending over. 注ַ讚 讻ָּ讗谉 the Ashkenazi minhag.

 

Although the Shulchan Aruch says to bend your head over your arm during 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐, the Sefardi minhag is to not do so (讘谉 讗讬砖 讞讬, 砖谞讛 , 驻专砖转 讻讬 转砖讗, 讗讜转 讬讙; 砖讜" 讬讞讜讜讛 讚注转, 讞诇拽 , 讘住讜祝 住讬诪谉 ).

 

The only community today that does 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 on the carpet covered floor mamash are certain Baladi Yemenite communities, but most of them today follow the regular Sefardi minhag.

 

The perek tehilim also differs between Ashkenazim and Sefardim. Ashkenazim say ' 讗ַ诇 讘ְּ讗ַ驻ְּ讱ָ 转讜ֹ讻ִ讬讞ֵ谞ִ讬 (转讛讬诇讬诐 ) and the Sefardim say 诇ְ讚ָ讜ִ讚 讗ֵ诇ֶ讬讱ָ ' 谞ַ驻ְ砖ִׁ讬 讗ֶ砖ָּׂ讗 (转讛讬诇讬诐 讻讛). The correct perek to say, according to the Zohar, is that of the Sefardim, however the Ari z"l said that unless you have the appropriate kavanot, saying mizmor 讻讛 is potentially dangerous. This is why the Ashkenazim say a different mizmor and bend their heads over their arms. For the same reason, the Sefardim do say this mizmor but do not bend their heads over their arms.

 

When a person exhibits such total self-nullification in front of HKB"H, it is no wonder that tefilot uttered at such a point are more readily accepted than others. This is the reason why Moshe's tefila was accepted, and also why R' Eliezer's wife tried to prevent her husband from doing 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐.

 

Obviously when someone does 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 it should not be used to cause others harm. 讗讜ֹ讬 讜ַ讗ֲ讘讜ֹ讬 if someone with a grudge uses 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 to get even with their enemies. Perhaps this is what the Ari z"l was referring to about the correct kavanot.

 

How is it then that de facto Moshe, in our parsha, used 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 to wreak retribution on Korach and his eida. How is it then that R' Eliezer's 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 resulted in retribution against Raban Gamliel for putting him in 讞ֵ专ֶ诐?

 

The answer is simple and lies at the heart of the machloket of Korach. Korach, who craved honor, had an agenda - it was a personal vendetta against Moshe and Aharon. Moshe and Aharon were the epitome of self-nullification. The only honor they were interested in was the honor of HKB"H! When Moshe prayed to HKB"H to punish Korach and his eida, it was not for his own honor, but for HKB"H's honor. And we see, his prayer was accepted.

 

Similarly, R' Eliezer was not interested in personal honor and revenge against those who put him in 讞ֵ专ֶ诐. Although R' Eliezer was a talmid of R' Yochanan ben Zakkai, who was from the school of Hillel, R' Eliezer is considered a 砖ַׁ诪ּ讜ּ转ִ讬, someone who follows the path of Shamai. He was convinced that his ruling was right, and in a perfect world (like with Shamai) it would have been right. During R' Eliezer's debate with R' Yehoshua, a bat kol from Heaven came down and declared – the halacha is like R' Eliezer in all cases! Despite that, the accepted ruling at the end of the day was not like R' Eliezer (Shamai), it was like Chachamim (Hillel), because in this imperfect world, the rules are not absolute, like R' Eliezer, they are fallible and make use of certain tools HKB"H gave us to make a ruling in cases of uncertainty, like 讗ַ讞ֲ专ֵ讬 专ַ讘ִּ讬诐 诇ְ讛ַ讟ֹּ转. R' Eliezer knew his ruling was the absolute truth and according to his perception, any opposing ruling dishonored the absolute Torah. The only thing R' Eliezer was interested in was preserving the honor of the Torah. And as we see, his prayer was also accepted.

 

There are so many lessons that we can learn from this that are applicable to the times we are living in.

 

The first lesson is how much we all need to work on self-nullification before HKB"H.

 

Here is a question I am sure you all know the answer to. How many people do you know - enjoy saying Tachanun in shul? Not many (if any), I think! Although I am not a big fan of Satmar and cannot find much to learn from their hashkafa, there is one little piece of Torah I must admit that I enjoyed hearing. R' Yoel, the Admor of Satmar (until 1958) once said "If the goyim knew how much pleasure Jews derive from not having to say Tachanun in shul, they would all be rushing to convert!" And he was right! Most of us, Rachmana litzlan, if we hear unexpectedly that there is a brit that day in shul and we don't have to say Tachanun, break into a wide smile and breathe a sigh of relief! For most of us, Tachanun is perceived as depressing and a burden. This is because we don't understand what a precious gem it is.

 

How much would you pay to have a hotline to Donald Trump, president of the USA? A personal red-phone on your desk with a direct line to him that he would pick up any time day or night and speak directly to you? Imagine … any problem you may encounter, you could simply pick up the phone and in seconds your problem would disappear, he would fix it personally or put you in touch with someone who could (I think only one person in the world has such a hotline - Melania). Now imagine if you had such a hotline, not to some mortal "emperor", great and powerful as he may be, but to the Creator of the universe!! How much would you pay for such a hotline?

 

We do all have such a hotline, it is called Tachanun. Tachanun, 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐, has the power to transmit our tefilot directly to HKB"H with no barriers and have them answered. Partially because we don't understand the power of 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐, or the technical "procedure" to make it work, we do not understand what a gem we have in our own pockets.

 

If we feel like we are davening and our prayers are not being answered it is because we all need to work more on self-nullification – removing our egos and selfish agendas from the equation and focusing more on davening for things that honor HKB"H and the Torah.  If we improve in that respect, then our Tachanun 'hotline" will begin to actually work and our prayers will be answered. If the focus of our tefilot is on HKB"H, the Torah and others, then miraculously HKB"H will also grant all the things we want for ourselves.

 

Imagine if you had an Aladdin "geni" who could grant you only three wishes. The first wish "Geni, I want to be the richest man on the planet!" Poof!, granted! The second wish "Geni, I want to be the wisest man on the planet!" Poof! granted. The third wish "Geni, I want to be the healthiest man on the planet!" Poof! granted. Three weeks later, news headlines "Wealthy genius doctor killed in car crash!"

 

When Moshe davened to HKB"H, it was never for himself. Moshe never asked HKB"H for power, wealth, wisdom, longevity (even when he implored HKB"H to allow him into Eretz Yisrael, it was not for him but for Am Yisrael, so he could build the everlasting Beit HaMikdash and bring the Geulah). Moshe's tefilot were always for others, to forgive Am Yisrael for their numerous sins in the Midbar, to cure Miriam for the lashon hara she spoke against him! These kind of tefilot were accepted. Moshe minimized himself and was an expert at self-nullification. As a result, HKB"H granted him everything he davened for, and in addition also gave him power, wealth, wisdom, etc. that he didn't daven for. Same with Aharon. Aharon did not do 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 outside the Mishkan, he used 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 as part of his avodah. Outside the Mishkan he embodied 谞ְ驻ִ讬诇ַ转 讗ַ驻ַּ讬ִ诐 in his personality and the way he lived. Aharon lived his life in constant joy, 砖ָׂ诪ֵ讞ַ 讘ְּ讞ֶ诇ְ拽讜ֹ讗讜ֹ讛ֵ讘 砖ָׁ诇讜ֹ诐 讜ְ专讜ֹ讚ֵ祝 砖ָׁ诇讜ֹ诐, devoting himself entirely to others.

 

These are the type of people HKB"H chooses to lead Am Yisrael. It has nothing to do with r茅sum茅 or qualifications. It has to do with self-nullification before HKB"H. This is what Korach didn't understand.

 

Between missile bombardments, running to the safe room and the normal day-to-day stuff we have to deal with on a regular basis here in Eretz HaKodesh, we are also on the verge of a new set of general elections and their accompanying "festivities". Many people are confronted with the question "Who to vote for?"

 

To be totally honest, I don't know if there is a single candidate in any of the parties who even resembles the description of self-nullification. The answer we then need to ask ourselves is "What kind of leaders do we want?" Do we want them to be Korach type leaders? Or Moshe and Aharon type leaders? If none of the candidates meet the required description that we are looking for, we need to find new candidates and not keep regurgitating the same candidates over and over again, each time donning a different suit, but underneath they are the same candidate, again and again. Albert Einstein said "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".

 

The change needs to begin with us. Our leaders are simply a reflection of us. If we want leaders who exemplify self-nullification before HKB"H, we need to start working on that in ourselves.

 

 

Shabbat Shalom

Eliezer Meir Saidel

Machon Lechem Hapanim

www.machonlechemhapanim.org  

Download PDF version  

Shiurim Main Menu