“Disbar" BARR as a DS DOJ FBI and CIA turncoat. His statement that that “there is no evidence that changes the election outcome” is treasonous and in retaliation for the Special OP raid on the CIA ability in Germany to impound the illegal Servers. What DT will do now is anyone’s guess, but should be middah kneged middah. This brings the War into the hornets nest, but who will eventually ALSO get stung! (my opinion)
OK WERE GETTING INFO THAT HIS COMMENTS WERE (the overworked phrase) "TAKEN OUT OF CONTEXT". BUT TIME WILL TELL AS ALL THE EVIDENCE GOES PUBLIC AND (PLUS) ON TO THE SUPREME COURT, AG BARR JUST INCREASED DURHAM’s SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION TO INCLUDE “PROSECUTION” UNDER 28 USC Sec 600.4-10. STAY TUNED.
HAS BILL BARR TURNED ON US!
Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.” very skeptical: theepochtimes
Correction: This is not civil war or insurrection.
It is FOREIGN WARFARE and TREASON
I’m leaving the Insurrection up for information purposes ONLY
TREASON: Treason is the crime of attacking a state authority to which one owes allegiance. the crime of betraying one's country, defined in Article III, section 3 of the U.S. Constitution: "Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort."
FOREIGN WARFARE: (restricted)
TREASON
Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and ...
SEDITION
While seditious conspiracy is generally defined as conduct or language inciting rebellion against the authority of a state, treason is the more-serious offense of actively levying war against the United States or giving aid to its enemies
Insurrection Act of 1807
Enacted by the 9th United States Congress
Effective March 3, 1807
Ulysses S. Grant (born Hiram Ulysses Grant; April 27, 1822 – July 23, 1885) was an American soldier and politician who served as the 18th president of the United States from 1869 to 1877. The various colonial militias became state militias when the United States became independent. ... In 2006, Congress passed the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act, which gave the president the authority to mobilize National Guard units within the U.S. without the consent of state governors
Anti Insurrection Act
The Insurrection Act of 1807 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act_of_1807)
is a United States federal law (10 U.S.C. §§ 251–255; prior to 2016, 10 U.S.C. §§ 331–335; amended 2006, 2007) that empowers the President of the United States to deploy U.S. military and federalized National Guard troops within the United States in particular circumstances. What former President used the military to save the Republic? Ulysses S. Grant (born Hiram Ulysses Grant; April 27, 1822 – July 23, 1885) was an American soldier and politician who served as the 18th president of the United States from 1869 to 1877
Martial Law
Typically, the imposition of martial law accompanies curfews; the suspension of civil law, civil rights, and habeas corpus; and the application or extension of military law or military justice to civilians. Civilians defying martial law may be subjected to military tribunal (court-martial).
Martial law in the United States(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martial_law_in_the_United_States) refers to times in United States history in which in a region, state, city, or the whole United States was placed under the control of a military body. On a national level, both the US President and the US Congress have the power impose martial law since both can be in charge of the militia.
1 comment:
Agree, but why is the Pres so slow to fire those who have betrayed him; so many.? I feel if it were any other of the previous presidents, they would have charged at least two dozen of these turncoats. So many questions!
Post a Comment