Part VI: Lies, Lies, and More Lies
The Myth of Palestinianism, Occupation, and Two-State Solutions
In a brilliant web of lies and sophistry, the ruling class created an ethnic group called Palestinians. Prior to 1948, Palestinian meant anyone who lived in Palestine, Jew or gentile. Now, Palestinian refers exclusively to Arabs whose ancestors at any time may have lived in Palestine under Ottoman rule and/or British Mandate. The narrative is that this population was rendered stateless by the "Jewish State" and earnestly wishes to have a state of their own, a “Palestinian Arab” state.
Of course, this story is false. There already is a Palestinian Arab state, one that predates the “Palestinian Jewish” state by two years. It is the State of Transjordan [1], so-called because it occupied the lion share of Palestine across the Jordan River to the east.
After waging a coordinated bloody attack on the Jews of the newly-declared “Jewish state” in 1948 together with the armies of numerous other Arab states, the Palestinian State of Transjordan occupied and annexed Judea and Samaria west of the Jordan river and henceforth changed its name to Jordan. Gaza on the far-western corner of Palestine was occupied by Egypt, and the Golan in the north was occupied by Syria.
There was nothing ethnically unique about the Arabs living in any of these regions. They had simply been part of the pan-Arab population of the Levant. The Arabs of these areas had never sought a “state of their own” in a positive sense. When statehood had been offered to them prior to 1948, they flatly rejected it. An Arab state on only part of western Palestine would have conceded the existence of a “Jewish state” in the remaining coastal portion.
When the hostile Arab states began preparing for war again in 1967, Israel attacked preemptively and these three territories fell under Israeli rule. That is when the Arab inhabitants of these areas began to protest an "illegal occupation" and demanded statehood.
This population, or the demagogues who speak for it, don't want a Palestinian Arab state. There is one, Jordan, and they don't wish to be part of it. When the so-called Palestinians demand a “state of their own,” it means only one thing, the negation of Jewish settlement therein. Their only definition for a state is one purged of Jews.
When Palestinian Arabs protest “illegal settlement,” they don't just mean Kiryat Arba or Itzhar, i.e. Jewish homes in Judea or Samaria. They mean Jewish homes in Tel Aviv and Haifa.
Palestinianism, therefore, has no positive self-identity. Instead, it implies a Judenrein Palestine, one from which Jews are forcibly expelled (or worse) "from the river to the sea."
Palestinianism is a hoax. It claims to be a worthy cause advocating for a stateless population, when in fact its true objective is a pretense for genocide and ethnic cleansing. The so-called Palestinian society has become nothing more than a weaponized chess piece for the ruling class of sociopaths, radicalized, indoctrinated, and incited to harbor irrationally xenophobic hostility towards Jews.
Palestinianism has nothing to do with historic Palestine. Palestine was a foreign-occupied region by definition. Never was Palestine a sovereign entity. The last sovereign kingdom that existed there was some 1,900 years ago. The name Palestine had not yet existed at that time. Instead, it was known by its original name Yehuda, land of the yehudim (Jews), or Judea in Latin.
Conversely, “Palestine” was occupied throughout its history, first by Romans from Rome, later by Byzantines from Byzantium, Arabs from Caliphate Arabia, Crusaders from Europe, Turks from Seljuk and Ottoman Empires, or Brits from the UK.
Jews, who descend from Jewish survivors of the former Judean kingdom, lived in Palestine through all this time without interruption, for 1,800 years prior to the founding of the State of Israel from the time the Romans changed the occupied province's name from Judea to Palestine in circa 135 CE [2], and for two additional millennia prior to Rome's occupation and its invented name “Palestine” [3].
By definition, any place called Palestine ought to tolerate and make space for Jews, the true original inhabitants of the Land [4].
Palestinianism has nothing to do with Palestine much like Zionism has nothing to do with Zion (l'havdil [5]).
They are both Trojan horses, fabrications whose objective is to impose tyranny, in Israel, in Gaza, and everywhere else.
Jews are not occupiers of Palestine just as Jews aren't occupiers to Zion.
However, every lie perforce contains a grain of truth [6].
Palestinians and their proponents protest an "occupation," and indeed there is one, except they have conveniently misidentified the occupiers.
"Occupation" implies a foreign power who colonized a land and marginalized its native inhabitants.
Palestinianism identifies Jews as foreign colonizers. Of course, this is patently false. Jews were never foreign to the Land of Judea, Palestine, or whatever you wish to call it.
Who are the actual foreign occupiers? Zionism and its Arab props.
Zionism is the insidiously foreign ideology that has been forced upon the Jewish people by foreign overlords.
Zionism is the occupation. And so is Anti-Zionism and Palestinianism. Foreign powers fabricated these fake ideologies to wreak havoc in the region and impose NWO tyranny.
In truth, Palestinianism is another form of cleverly-disguised statism. "Two-State Solution" is just another name for "Final Solution," since that's the true objective of every modern state, totalitarian subjugation and elimination of the world's human population.
"Two-State Solution" is a hoax of epic proportion.
Jews are already suffering under the first state, the one that's supposedly their own. The last thing they need is another state of unambiguous Jew-haters to finish off the job, Heaven forfend, in collaboration with the nominally-Jewish first State.
Demands to “free Palestine” is a monstrous lie. Palestinian Arabs won't be free in an Islamic police state, or in any modern state, for that matter. It will only intensify their servitude.
No, we don't need a "Two-State Solution." Instead, we need a "No-State Solution." We need salvation from the one State that's already assaulting us with democide. We need a completely new grassroots administration of the land, one that's independent from the cabal of predatory sociopaths.
This would resolve the Arab suffering as well. Once Jews are freed from the democidal state, they're free to defend themselves from all other genocidal enemies. When all mortal threats are eliminated, Jews and Arabs can then learn to live together peacefully, just like they did for generations in historic Palestine.
Moreover, Israel can then be true to its name, the "one who walks upright with God and men and perseveres" [7].
Once we discard the counterfeit state that insidiously usurped our name, we, the true people of Israel can achieve our destiny as People of the Land [8].
May it be speedily in our days.
Notes:
[1] It assumed the name Jordan after occupying Judea and Samaria west of the Jordan River.
[2] “Common Era.” This refers to the time period that Christians refer to as “AD,” or “Anno Domini” or year of their lord. Since we do not wish to ascribe divinity to a human being, Jews typically replace BC and AD with BCE (before common era) and CE (common era) when referencing dates on the Julian or Gregorian calendars.
[3] The Romans sought to revive the name “Philistia,” an ancient tribe that had been hostile to the Israelites and Judeans. The Philistines ceased to exist after the Assyrian conquest and forced exiles of the sixth-century BCE, at least seven or eight hundred years prior to the Roman rehashing of that name. The purpose for the renaming was an obvious attempt at discrediting the authenticity of Jewish entitlement to the Land, since Philistine tribes had inhabited the seacoast prior to Israel's arrival under the leadership of Joshua in 1,273 BCE. However, it should be noted, for history's sake, that the Philistines were not indigenous to the Land. In fact, the very name פלשת (Philistia) connotes invaders. That's because the original Philistines were marauding seafarers, like the later Vikings, who came from overseas, invaded and occupied the Land in pre-Exodus times.
[4] Even though ancient Israel, who had returned from Egyptian exile, conquered the land from its Canaanite inhabitants in the times of Joshua, see Rashi on Genesis 12:6. The Land was originally bequeathed to the descendants of Shem, Abraham's ancestor. The Canaanites, descendants of Ham, subsequently invaded and inhabited the Land, driving out the Shemite inhabitants. When the Land was later promised to Abraham, it was because it had been his family's rightful inheritance. Abraham's descendants Jacob/Israel and his family lived in the Land prior to their descent to Egypt. In Gen. 40:15, Israel's son Joseph related how he had been kidnapped from the “Land of the Hebrews,” i.e. the descendants of Eber, Shem's great-grandson. Abraham had also been called “Abram the Hebrew” due to his descent from Eber in Gen. 14:13. Pharaoh similarly referred to the Israelites as Hebrews. Scripture describes how the Children of Israel are the sole heirs to the legacy of Abraham and Isaac. Edomites and Ishmaelites have no lawful claim to the Land.
[5] L'havdil means "to separate (i.e. between holy and profane)." This term is used when comparing or juxtaposing holy and unholy terms or ideas. In this sentence, "Palestine," "Palestinianism," and "Zionism" are all profane terms. "Zion" is the anglicization of a sacred term that originates in scripture, even if it's been misconstrued by Zionism.
[6] Midrash Rabbah on Numbers 13:27 cited in Rashi ibid.
[7] Genesis 32:29.
[8] Leviticus 20:2, Sifra, Rashi.
Rabbi Michoel Green's Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Link in article title
No comments:
Post a Comment