PLEASE USE A NAME WHEN COMMENTING

14 December 2022

Ta’anit 19a

[this is but one source for defining a “pandemic” vs epidemic,  contagion, pestilence]

Ta'anit 19a ~ On the Definition of a Pandemic

THE DEFINITION OF A PANDEMIC IN THE TALMUD

All of this is by way of introducing today’s page of Talmud, which takes a stab at defining a pandemic:

תענית יט, א

אֵיזֶהוּ דֶּבֶר? עִיר הַמּוֹצִיאָה חֲמֵשׁ מֵאוֹת רַגְלִי, וְיָצְאוּ מִמֶּנָּה שְׁלֹשָׁה מֵתִים בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים זֶה אַחַר זֶההֲרֵי זֶה דֶּבֶר, פָּחוֹת מִכָּאןאֵין זֶה דֶּבֶר 

What is considered a plague?  If a city that sends out five hundred infantrymen, [i.e., it has a population of five hundred able-bodied men, and three dead are taken out of it on three consecutive days,] this is a plague of pestilence, which requires fasting and crying out. [If the death rate is lower than that, this is not pestilence.]

In a couple of pages the Talmud will further define the definition we have in the Mishnah:

תענית כא,א

. תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: עִיר הַמּוֹצִיאָה חֲמֵשׁ מֵאוֹת וְאֶלֶף רַגְלִי, כְּגוֹן כְּפַר עַכּוֹ, וְיָצְאוּ הֵימֶנָּה תִּשְׁעָה מֵתִים בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים זֶה אַחַר זֶההֲרֵי זֶה דֶּבֶר

The Sages taught: If a city that sends out fifteen hundred infantrymen, i.e., one that has a population of at least fifteen hundred men, e.g., the village of Akko, and nine dead are removed from it on three consecutive days, i.e., three dead per day, this is considered a plague of pestilence.

But pandemics don’t follow linear rules, or recognize neat periods of 24 hours, and the Talmud delves a little further:

בְּיוֹם אֶחָד אוֹ בְּאַרְבָּעָה יָמִיםאֵין זֶה דֶּבֶר. וְעִיר הַמּוֹצִיאָה חֲמֵשׁ מֵאוֹת רַגְלִי, כְּגוֹן כְּפַר עֲמִיקוּ, וְיָצְאוּ הֵימֶנָּה שְׁלֹשָׁה מֵתִים בִּשְׁלֹשָׁה יָמִים זֶה אַחַר זֶההֲרֵי זֶה דֶּבֶר

If all nine died on a single day, while none died on the other days, or if the nine died over a period of four days, this is not a plague of pestilence. And a city that sends out five hundred infantrymen, for example, the village of Amiko, and three dead are removed from it on three consecutive days, this is a plague of pestilence.

Now this might sound a little confusing. First we are told that three people need to die each day for three consecutive days for a pandemic to be declared. But then we learn that if all nine die on one day, or over four days rather than three, then there is no pandemic declaration. And then comes this:

בְּיוֹם אֶחָד אוֹ בְּאַרְבָּעָה יָמִיםאֵין זֶה דֶּבֶר

If all three died on one day or over four days, this is not a plague of pestilence.

Rashi explains that if all three die on a single day, or over four days -  אין זה דבר, דאקראי בעלמא הוא - this does not meet the definition of a pandemic, but rather it is a chance occurrence. The point here is that for a pandemic to be declared, we need a pattern of disease over a unit of time. The Talmud is trying to find the best pattern over the best unit of time that would make the declaration of a pandemic meaningful. We might argue that a better definition might be found, but as we have seen, even today the definition of a pandemic is elusive and changes frequently. 


BONUS CONTENT: EVEN MORE ON HOW WE MEASURE PANDEMIC DEATHS

In 1854 in London there was a deadly outbreak of cholera. The British physician John Snow determined that it was caused by a contaminated water supply, and, so the famous story goes, when he removed the handle to the pump that supplied the dangerous water, the epidemic ended.

But what exactly was the effect of removing that handle? Well, it depends on how we measure things. Here for example is one way of visualizing that effect:


DIAGRAM



This and the following images are from From Edwin Tufte, Visual Explanations, pp. 27-37

It’s pretty impressive, right? But now let’s visualize the same data in another way:




Diagram


Now the effect of removing the handle seems even more impressive. The deaths dropped from about 500 per week to about 100. But all we have done here is to slightly change the way in which the dates are grouped together. In the first chart the x-axis had August 20-26, then August 27-September 2 and so on. In the second chart the x-axis was August 18-24, August 25-31, and so on. Same deaths, different way to display the data. Now let’s take one last look at the same data, but this time the x-axis does not display periods of seven days. Instead, it displays day-by-day. 




Cholera Diagram


When the data is displayed in this way, the effect of the removal of the handle from the Broad Street pump seems to disappear entirely, because the cholera epidemic was already waining. In fact, the result of Snow’s intervention will depend on the arbitrary choice of time periods and the way we display the data.  And we can also generalize to all pandemics. Any method to count pandemic deaths will be arbitrary, but that does not make it useless. We just have to be clear about why we decided to count the way that we did, and explain that decision. That is true whether you are the World Health Organization, The Centers for Disease Control, of the rabbis of the Talmud.


https://www.talmudology.com/jeremybrownmdgmailcom/2021/11/28/taanit-19-on-the-definition-of-a-pandemic


No comments:

Reb Ginsbourg: Yosef's two Dreams

  Yosef's two dreams Selected commentaries explain why Joseph's brothers were angered by his dreams. We read in our Parasha: (37:3-1...