Six years ago, it became abundantly clear to me that the government and complicit establishment cannot be trusted as a reliable source of information.
If they’re capable of fabricating pandemics and locking me down without a shred of empirical evidence that my aerosol posed actual risk to anyone, then what else are they capable of fabricating?
It was a rude awakening of sorts, the realization that we had been horribly lied to and duped, repeatedly. Whoever had dared question the narrative was derided, marginalized, silenced, censored, cancelled, persecuted, or all the above. I learned this by first-hand experience.
It wasn’t just that they deceived us for purposes of corporate greed or garden-variety corruption. It was clearly a diabolical agenda to groom us for compliance and submission to an unspeakable evil.
It wasn’t just the government. It was nearly the entire medical establishment, all multinational corporations, just about every large institution. It was all-embracing and truly Orwellian.
At that watershed moment, I realized that government and complicit establishment are no longer to be trusted.
This made me revisit everything I had ever accepted as truth and question it. How do I indeed know this was true? Is there evidence from independent sources?
Many would dismiss this as “diving down the rabbit hole,” but I just call it exercising healthy intelligence.
After much consideration, I reached the reasonable conclusion: if the only eyewitness accounts of any news item or alleged occurrence are/were of individuals payrolled by government or multinational corporations, their testimonies are to be regarded as nothing more than unsubstantiated hearsay.
That’s not to say that the corporatist establishment necessarily lies about everything. If that had been the case, then it would have been too easy to parse fact from fiction. If they lied consistently about everything, then no one would believe them about anything. Rather, their duplicity is complex, inconsistent, and unpredictable. Sometimes they report the truth, or partial truths, at least. The ruse is: if you believe them about something, then you’ll believe them about everything.
The trick is to realize that they could potentially be lying about anything, so their word means nothing. Instead, use discretion and demand evidence.
Realize that they’re pathological liars, so always ask questions.
Without admissible evidence from independent sources, the baseline assumption is that it probably didn’t happen as reported, if at all.
Examples include the 9/11 and 10/7 narratives, NASA’s alleged space exploits, the polio and measles narratives, and many more.
Was there a hijacking on September 11th or was it an inside job? The latter should be assumed minus any evidence to the contrary.
Was there a moon landing in 1969 or a moon flyover in 2026? Maybe, but without any admissible evidence from independent eyewitnesses, the assumption is it did not occur. Same with regards to all of NASA’s wildly unsubstantiated claims.
PARSING FACT FROM FICTION
It’s really the same as the tooth fairy or Santa Claus. While we have no evidence that a lunar flyover or Santa Claus fly over did not occur, the reasonable assumption is it never did. Onus of proof lies on the believers to provide evidence that it did. No such evidence exists to prove the truth of NASA’s moonlandings or moon flyovers.
Everyone who claims to have witnessed it are government employees.
Same with regards to nuclear bombs or other WMDs. Stop living in fear of their threats. Take it all with equanimity. Maybe it’s fictional. Do you know anyone who actually witnessed one?
At the very least, take a deep breath of fresh air and stop reacting to their headlines.
Instead, ask healthy questions and stop letting their myths define your reality.
Realize that your deadliest enemy is your government, not anyone else’s alleged nukes.
Stop complying and start ignoring.
No comments:
Post a Comment