24 February 2014
Going to prison for doing a mitzvah?
Going to prison for doing a mitzvah?
"Have you heard the news? The United States Government has sentenced a number of Jews to prison for the crime of giving charity. Yup, that's right. These people gave money to charity, and because of this, they were sentenced to prison. This has happened to lots and lots of Jews. You might even have heard of some of them - Bernie Madoff, associates of the Spinka Rebbe, etc.
"Of course, this is a nonsensical way of describing the situation. Bernie Madoff was not sentenced to prison because of what he did with his money. He was imprisoned because of what he didn't do with his money, i.e. to give it to the investors who it belonged to. People who are punished for tax evasion are not being punished for spending their money on houses and cars - they are being punished for not giving their money to the government.
"This is all obvious, right? Yet for some inexplicable reason, the same mistake in describing the current situation in Israel vis-a-vis charedim and army is being committed by a wide range of people.
"I'm not talking about whether it is innately right or wrong, fair or unfair to other Israelis, or strategically wise or unwise to punish charedi draft-dodgers with prison. But in order to have any meaningful discussion about it, we have to describe the situation accurately.
"Nobody is being "sent to prison for learning Torah." They are being sent to prison for avoiding army service. They are not going to prison because of what they are doing with their time; they are going to prison because of what they aren't doing with their time. It's true that they are learning Torah while not being in the army, but it is inaccurate and inappropriately inflammatory to describe this as the reason for their going to prison."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
馃挵馃挵馃挵"讜讜讬转讜专 砖诇 讗诇驻讬 讚讜诇专讬诐 讘讻讬住": 驻住拽 讛讛诇讻讛 讛诪讛讚讛讚 砖诇 讛诪谞讛讬讙 讛讙专"讚 诇谞讚讜 诇拽专讗转 讛讘讞讬专讜转 讘拽讜讚砖 驻谞讬诪讛
砖讗诇讛 拽砖讛 讛讜爪讙讛 讛砖讘讜注 讘驻谞讬 诪谞讛讬讙 讛讚讜专 专讘讬谞讜 诪专谉 专讗砖 讛讬砖讬讘讛 讛讙专"讚 诇谞讚讜 砖诇讬讟"讗 砖讜讞讟讬诐 讘讙讜驻讬 讛讻砖专讜转 讗诪讜专讬诐 诇爪讗转 讘讬诪讬诐 讛拽专讜讘讬诐 诇砖讞讬讟讜...
7 comments:
I disagree with Rabbi Slifkin's assertion that it is inaccurate or inappropriately inflammatory. It's actually very accurate and very appropriately inflammatory. It should inflame one's passion against it.
Lema'aseh, a boy who is learning Torah is being told that he can no longer do so and must join the army, and if he doesn't, he will be sent to prison.
Rav Shteinman Shlit"a is correct to say that sending those who wish to stay learning to prison (which will be the end result no matter which way you slice it) is a Hillul Hashem of the highest order, which must be protested.
(By the way, your link doesn't work.)
Yaak, But what about this:
"As the proposed bill is now structured, very few actual haredi yeshiva students would be drafted against their will. Instead, the haredi quota would primarily be filled by ba’al teshuvas, ex-haredim, haredi shabbabnikim (‘bums’ who either were expelled from haredi yeshivas or walked out of them and who now roam the streets in packs), and Chabad hasidim (who are not part of the mainstream haredi community and its negotiating process)."
The above I believe was conceived by those close to Rav Shteinman.
"But the proposed bill as it is now worded would allow many haredim to leave yeshiva in their early- to mid-20s, and would also lead to many haredim joining the workforce in some fashion, things haredi rabbinic leaders feel would lessen the authenticity of the haredi community – and haredi rabbis’ hold on their followers."
See my blog where I answered you.
Kol Tuv,
Yaakov
Post a Comment