Totalitarian Israeli Democracy in the Age of Reason
Diagnosing the disease that cripples the Jewish State: A system where law becomes plunder and the popular will, a tool of tyranny
Imagine transporting two thinkers from the past to the corridors of the Israeli Knesset.
One is Frédéric Bastiat, a 19th-century French economist, whose treatise, The Law, reads like a contemporary critique of the proceedings. The other is J.L. Talmon, an Israeli historian from the 1960’s, whose life’s work charted the path from messianic idealism to political coercion.
They are unlikely companions, separated by a century and circumstance. Yet, were they to observe the Knesset today, they would find their intellectual warnings playing out in real-time. They would watch as parties purporting to represent the highest moral ideals of the Jewish people engage in frantic horse-trading, their principles becoming currency in a bazaar of political survival.
Bastiat would turn to Talmon and observe that the law here is no longer a protector of rights, but a tool for what he called “legal plunder.” Talmon would nod grimly, adding that this is the inevitable result of what he called “totalitarian democracy”—a system that pursues an absolute, collective good at the expense of individual liberty and authentic tradition.
This is not a fantasy. This is the political reality of modern Israel, a nation born from a dream of sovereignty and self-determination, yet now trapped in a paradoxical system that seems to embody the most dire warnings of these two thinkers.
Israel is called a Jewish democracy, but its political engine runs on a fuel that corrupts the very ideals it claims to represent. Nowhere is this paradox more painfully visible than in the plight of its Haredi parties. Tasked with being the guardians of the Torah, they have been rendered mere wheeler-dealers in a system that forces them to plunder the public trough to ensure the survival of their institutions. In doing so, they must often compromise the very Torah principles they exist to defend.
To understand how this happened is to understand the profound intellectual and spiritual crisis at the heart of the Zionist project—a crisis rooted in an Enlightenment error that has torn the nation apart.
The Foundational Flaw: Law as Plunder
Frédéric Bastiat’s argument in The Law is devastatingly simple. The law, he wrote, is the collective organization of the individual’s right to self-defense. Its sole purpose is to protect life, liberty, and property. But the law can be perverted. It can be turned against its purpose and used not to protect, but to violate.
When the law takes from some persons what belongs to them and gives it to other persons to whom it does not belong, it has become an instrument of plunder. This “legal plunder,” Bastiat warned, is more insidious than the illegal kind, for it is committed without remorse and with the full force of the state, eroding the very distinction between justice and injustice in the minds of the people.
Israel’s system of proportional representation is a near-perfect engine for institutionalizing legal plunder. With a low electoral threshold, the Knesset is a fractured mosaic of narrow interest groups, making majority coalitions almost impossible to form without buying the loyalty of smaller parties.
This is where the tragedy of the Haredi parties begins. To secure funding for their yeshivas, schools, and community stipends—the lifeblood of a world dedicated to Torah study—they must join secular-led coalitions. Their price of entry is their vote. In exchange, the government allocates a portion of the state budget, funded by all taxpayers, to their specific constituency. This is the very definition of legal plunder: the law is used to transfer wealth from the general public to a specific group.
The result is a spiritual catastrophe. Haredi leaders, who should be the nation’s moral compass, are forced into a Machiavellian game. They must remain silent or even lend support when the government enacts policies that contradict Jewish law, whether on matters of ceding territory, gender disorientation, or the definition of Jewish identity. The alternative is to be cast into the opposition, where their institutions would face financial ruin.
This constant compromise breeds cynicism. The broader Israeli public, seeing religious leaders engaged in transactional politics, comes to despise the very parties meant to represent Jewish morality. The Haredim, in turn, view the state not as a sacred enterprise but as an ATM—a hostile entity from which one must extract as much as possible.
Bastiat saw it all coming: “As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose—that it may violate property instead of protecting it—then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder.”
Zion’s Secular Will: The Rise of Totalitarian Democracy
If Bastiat explains the mechanism of Israel’s political corruption, J.L. Talmon explains its ideology. In The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy, Talmon drew a crucial distinction between two forms of democracy that emerged from the Enlightenment. The first is liberal democracy, which sees politics as a matter of trial and error and prioritizes individual freedom.
The second, and more dangerous, is totalitarian democracy. This form is messianic and ideological. It believes it possesses the sole and exclusive truth of a pre-ordained, harmonious social order. It posits a “general will” as the ultimate good, and any individual or group that deviates from this will is seen not as a legitimate dissenter, but as an obstacle to be re-educated or liquidated.
Zionism, particularly in its secular, socialist form, was a classic example of this messianic impulse. It was not merely a political movement but a “replacement theology” for Judaism itself, seeking to create a “New Jew” defined not by covenant and Torah, but by land and state sovereignty. This new national identity became the “general will.” The state, as the embodiment of this will, became the ultimate arbiter of morality and purpose. This created a system that, as Talmon warned, is inherently hostile to any source of authority—like divine law (Halacha)—that it does not control.
This is the source of Israel’s tyranny of tolerance. The state is infinitely tolerant of external enemies, forever seeking rational negotiations and peace processes with those sworn to its destruction. This is the logic of the secular Enlightenment, which believes all conflicts can be resolved through reason.
Internally, however, the system is mercilessly intolerant of those who challenge its core secular dogmas. Religious Jews who insist on the primacy of Torah law, or residents of Judea and Samaria who embody the divine deed to the land, are treated as irrational fanatics standing in the way of the state’s “enlightened” path. The Supreme Court, populated by secular jurists, frequently strikes down Knesset laws that reflect Jewish values, imposing its own vision of a liberal-progressive state in the name of abstract democratic principles—a perfect manifestation of the “general will” overriding tradition and particularity.
A Nation at War With Itself
When Bastiat’s legal plunder combines with Talmon’s totalitarian democracy, the result is what can be called a Zionist autoimmune disorder: a nation whose own defense mechanisms have turned against it. The state, in its pursuit of a secular, universalist morality, adopts rules of engagement that endanger its own soldiers to protect enemy civilians, a moral inversion that would be unthinkable for a nation truly committed to its own survival. This obsession with appearing virtuous in the eyes of a hostile world—the hallmark of a ghetto mentality—is a symptom of a state that has lost its own authentic moral compass, having traded the certainty of Torah for the fickle judgment of “the family of nations.”
This internal conflict produces what we termed “political thalidomide”—policies that are presented as safe and beneficial but end up deforming the body politic. The Oslo Accords, for example, were prescribed by the secular left as a cure for conflict but instead unleashed a wave of murder that killed thousands. The 2005 Gaza Expulsion was sold as a painful but necessary surgery to improve security, but it created an Islamic state on Israel’s border. In each case, the “general will” of a messianic, secular peace ideology overrode the practical warnings of those who were dismissed as extremists. The state demanded conformity, and dissent was treated as heresy.
This forces a terrible choice upon the religious citizen: serving two masters, G-d or the State. The state-sponsored Chief Rabbinate, a relic of the British Mandate, is perpetually caught in this bind, often compelled to issue rulings that align with government policy rather than honest Halacha. The spiritual authority of state-employed rabbis is compromised, as the public sees them as little more than civil servants. This is the end-game of Talmon’s totalitarian democracy: the co-opting and eventual neutralization of any independent moral authority.
Orwell’s Shadow in Jerusalem
To sustain such a contradictory system requires a level of willful blindness that would make George Orwell blush. After the catastrophic intelligence and military failures of October 7th, 2023, the nation’s leadership and much of its populace have engaged in a remarkable act of cognitive dissonance. To admit that the state’s foundational secular-liberal assumptions about its enemies were catastrophically wrong would be to admit that the entire ideological edifice is built on sand. It is easier to blame individuals than to question the system, easier to call for unity than to engage in a painful national reckoning.
This is the self-preservation instinct of a totalitarian democracy. The “general will” must be maintained at all costs, even if it means ignoring the glaring truth. Bastiat understood this phenomenon in the economic sphere, noting how people who benefit from legal plunder—or even those who merely suffer from it—will often rise to defend the very system that harms them because they cannot imagine an alternative. In Israel, the entire society is caught in this trap, clinging to a broken political model because the alternative—a genuine Jewish constitutional democracy that subordinates the state to enduring Jewish principles—is too radical to contemplate.
For now, the warnings of Bastiat and Talmon continue their vigil. They watch a nation blessed with immense creativity, courage, and emunah, yet shackled by a political system that perverts its laws and tyrannizes its spirit.
The frantic deal-making in the Knesset is not just politics; it is a symptom of a deep and unresolved battle for Israel’s soul.
It is the sound of a nation founded on a promise of return, still struggling to decide what, exactly, it has returned to: the transient power of a secular state, or the eternal covenant that defined it for millennia.
Continue reading on Jewish Home News by Mordechai Sones
No comments:
Post a Comment