PLEASE USE A NAME WHEN COMMENTING

03 October 2025

Reb Ginsbourg: Remember us for Life


Our prayer to G-d during the Ten Days of Repentance is analyzed here in tribute to the victims of the Manchester terror attack


For the past ten days, in our Shmoneh Esreh prayers during the Ten Days of Repentance, from Rosh Hashanah till Yom Kippur,  we added the prayer of Zochreinu :


זכרנו לחיים מלך חפץ בחיים למענך :

אלקים חיים מלך חפץֶ בחיים


‘Remember us for life, O king who desires life, for your sake, living king’.


If we contemplate the literal meaning of these words, we cannot but wonder at our audacity in addressing them to Hashem - more so, on the days that He is sitting in judgment on each of us - and deciding our fate in the coming year. In this supplication, we are saying: judge us favorably - ‘to Life’ - ‘for YOUR sake, O King who desires life’.

Imagine that this was a case where you were before the judge for a traffic infringement, and, by way of defence, you said to the judge : ‘Acquit me, judge, for your sake’.


Yet, this is the substance is what we are saying to the Supreme Judge - who is judging us, not for a minor transgression - but for our entire fate.


Could there be a more chutzpadik plea, than this?

What basis could we forward for saying: a favorable judgement is ‘for Your sake’ , Judge?


Might we ‘rely’ on the comment in several places of Rashi - as, for example, on Vayikra 1:9 - that our performance of the mitzvah of ‘the animal on the altar, as a burnt offering, a fire offering, is a pleasing fragrance to Hashem’ - ‘pleasing’, comments Rashi, ‘for I commanded, and My will was fulfilled’.


Could we extrapolate, from this Rashi, that ‘our performance of mitzvot, is למענך: for Your sake, Hashem’ - as we say in our prayer, because it gives You nachat ruach?

Is it not more correct to say - as we in fact say in the last parsha preceding the Shema of Arvit : ‘Your commandments are.. our life and the length of our days’ , rather than that we perform them ‘for Your sake’?


Further, is this not implicit in the blessing which we confer on one who has performed a mitzvah: תזכה למצוות : may you merit to be granted the opportunity to perform more mitzvot- by Hashem?


This, in fact, is the assertion in Iyov (41:3), on the rhetorical question - by Hashem :’Who has preceded Me, in giving - and I will reward him. The midrash - on this passuk - adds: ’Who is the one who has preceded Me, to circumcise his son, and to whom I had not given a son..cried out the ruach hakodesh; who extolled praises to Me, before I gave him his soul.?’- and, so with each of the other mitzvot enumerated there.


This truth is beautifully encapsulated by the Kuzari:’Every mitzvah that comes before a person, is like an invitation from Hashem, for the person to come closer to Hashem’ -adds Rav Matityahu Solomon: ’like an invitation to sup at Hashem’s table’.


This surely is a priceless gift to us - ‘for our sake’ - not למענך אלקים: for Your sake, O G-d!


Let us - for the purpose of our enquiry, posit that, by doing mitzvot and good deeds, we are, in some way, doing למענך ה': ’for Your sake’, Hashem, and - this being the heart of our supplication: Judge us for life, for Your sake, so that we are able to continue ton ‘give you’ nachat - which, we clearly can not do, should You not judge us to life.


If we should decide that this is an opening to pray that our prayer should be accepted; ‘for Your sake, Hashem’, we are still confronted with an impassable barrier - that on Rosh Hashanah, we have crowned Hashem, as our King.


Rav Azriel Tauber elucidates: ’On Rosh Hashanah - unlike on the other moadim - we do not ‘ receive’ a gift from Hashem, we ‘give’ to Him - something which is contrary to our logic - as, by our logic, there is nothing we can give to Hashem, as He is complete in the fullness of completeness.


Says the Rav: ’We have but to ‘believe’ that Hashem asks something of us on Rosh Hashanah:((Rosh Hashanah 16.):’Crown Me as your king, over you’.


‘Rosh Hashanah is a moed that is ‘completely concealed - the other moadim are in the middle of the month, as if on them we can see Hashem - not so, Rosh Hashanah, the moon is completely unseen - alluding to our relationship with Hashem being completely ‘unseen’ by us - we are but to believe, and to fulfill Hashem’s request:’Say before Me verse of kingship - so that you crown Me as your king, over you’.


‘Here we ask: Since Hashem is complete without any lack - what does He need from us - what can we give Him?


‘The answer , say our Sages, is that for Hashem to be a King, He needs someone who will crown Him, and who will be His subjects, by crowning Him over them.

‘This’ concludes the Rav, ‘is what Hashem ‘needs’ from us, on Rosh Hashanah :that we - the subjects He needs - live, and it is to this, that we rely upon in our prayer:’For Your Sake, remember us for life.’


We find the same words -‘over you’ - in another place, in Parashat Shoftim, regarding the crowning of a king for Israel - and therein lies our difficulty.

The Torah there states:(17:14-15) ’When you come to the Land…and settle in it, and you will say: ’I will set a king over myself.. You shall set over yourself a king whom Hashem, your G-d shall choose from among yout brethren shall you set a king over yourself..’


Let us note that three times in these psukim, the Torah uses the words:’over you’.

Our Sages, on these psukim, comment:( Kid’ 32.):’A king who forgives an offence against his honor, his honor is not forgiven.’.


Their reason: the seemingly superfluous words ‘over you’ - which are used not once, but three times - require that the appointed king be ‘over you’- that you be in awe of him, this precluding forgiving offences against his honor


Herein lies our problem: Since - as we have brought - on Rosh Hashanah, Hashem is crowned - as is His request - He is ipso facto precluded from forgiving transgressions which have been committed against Him - which are offences against His honor.

How, then can He grant our prayers of these days, for life, which means: forgiving the transgressions we have committed against Him, and His honor?


Here, we can but wonder at the genius of our Sages, who provide an answer, by the wording of the prayer of ‘Remember us for life..King who desires life..for Your sake..’.

We have so far focused on the word ‘למענך’: ‘for Your sake’ - but the answer lies in other seemingly superfluous words they have chosen, in our prayer: מלך חפץ בחיים: ‘O King, who desires life’.


What do these words add?

They are the key to enabling Hashem - granting our prayers, to ‘remember us for life’.

How? Because our Sages also say: (Yerushalmi Pe’ah 1:1)‘רצונו של אדם, הוא כבודו’:’ A person’s will, is his honor’ - to fulfill a person’s wish, is to honor him’.


The extent to which this applies, can be seen from the Yerushalmi gemara, we have cited: ’The mother of Rabbi Ishmael, out of her awe for his being one of the gedolai hador, wanted to imbibe the water in which he had washed his feet.


‘The Sages wondered: How could Rabbi Ishmael permit this seeming dishonor of his mother?

They answered: to the contrary - this was not disrespecting her, since this was her wish, performing it, was ‘her honor’.’

If this was the honor due to the will of the mother of Rabbi Ishmael, how much more is the honor due to the desire of the King of Kings!


With this foundation, we now have an opening, to permit our prayer of ‘Remember us..O king’..because, You ‘desire life’ - Your Will is to grant our supplication AND, since this is Your will, fuflilling it, is also ‘Your honor’ - and not a breach of the King from the ‘prohibition’ on waiving His honor!

What proof can we bring, to substantiate our plea, that: to grant us life, is Your Wish’ - other than our words, in our prayer - and, that, more than this, it is also למענך:’for Your Sake’, as we plead in the next word of this prayer?


The answer lies in addressing the question: Why did Hashem, who is complete in every respect, create man - what need was there for this, in His eyes?

We have brought the answer of Rav Tauber to this question.


Rav Avigdor Nebenzahl proffers a different answer , one at the core of Rosh Hashanah: ’From a contemplation of the ways of Hashem - as far as our limited minds can go - Hashem created man - indeed the world - so that He could fulfill His wish, to do chessed, as - had there not been any creations, Hashem would be unable, to fulfill His will.


‘We find therefore, that the will to do chessed, does not derive from the needs of the recipient, but from the will of the giver - Hashem!’


Relating this to the words of our prayer, we find that, the desire pf Hashem to grant life to man, on the Days of Judgement, is truly ‘for His sake’. In the midrashim which deal with the creation of man, we can find an aid to this - we read, that when Hashem ‘consulted the heavenly denizens, as to creating man (Breishit 1:27) ‘in His image, in the image of G-d’, they asked: this ‘man’, what is his essence, his nature’? - and, sadly, as we read in Avot, ‘the first ten generations all angered G-d’, but then came Avraham, the pillar of Chessed, in whose merit Hashem created man - to do chessed.


This is captured in a midrash, expounding a difficult passuk:( 2:4) ’These are the generations of the heavens and the earth בהבראם: when they were created’ - the unusual word בהבראם: was chosen, because, when its letters are re-arranged, spell באברהם - alluding to the world being created in the merit of Avraham.’


We read in Pirkei Avot (2:4):’Rabban Gamliel, the son of Rabbi Yehuda haNasi said:’Do His will as if it were yours, so that He may do your will as if it were His.


We ask, in this, our prayer of ‘Remember us for life, King who desires life..’ - that this being Your will, too, then- as we are promised in Pirkei Avot - you do our will, as ‘Your will’ - and remember us for life.


May Hashem grant us comfort.


לרפואת יהונתן בן קינלה ושרונה בת לאה, בתוך שאר חולי עמנו, ובברכת פיתקא טבא לכל בני ישראל


Eliezer Meir Saidel: Fifty Degrees in the Shade – Haazinu


יִמְצָאֵהוּ בְּאֶרֶץ מִדְבָּר וּבְתֹהוּ יְלֵל יְשִׁמֹן יְסֹבְבֶנְהוּ יְבוֹנְנֵהוּ יִצְּרֶנְהוּ כְּאִישׁוֹן עֵינוֹ. (דברים לב, י)

עֲלֵה אֶל הַר הָעֲבָרִים הַזֶּה הַר נְבוֹ אֲשֶׁר בְּאֶרֶץ מוֹאָב אֲשֶׁר עַל פְּנֵי יְרֵחוֹ וּרְאֵה אֶת אֶרֶץ כְּנַעַן אֲשֶׁר אֲנִי נֹתֵן לִבְנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל לַאֲחֻזָּה. (שם, מט)

Except in years when Yom Kippur is on Shabbat, parshat Haazinu always precedes Sukkot. In this week's shiur we will be discussing a few things from the parsha, but predominantly concentrating on Sukkot.  

The question I would like to answer in this shiur is "In whose merit do we celebrate Sukkot – Moshe's or Aharon's?"

This is actually related to a famous machloket in the Gemara (Sukkot 11b) between R’ Akiva and R’ Eliezer. כִּי בַסֻּכּוֹת הוֹשַׁבְתִּי אֶת בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּהוֹצִיאִי אוֹתָם מֵאֶרֶץ מִצְרָיִם (ויקרא כג, מג). According to R' Akiva, it is referring to actual sukkot, temporary dwellings. According to R' Eliezer, it is referring to the עַנְנֵי הַכָּבוֹד that surrounded Am Yisrael in the Midbar. 

The Tur (אורח חיים, תרכה) is posek le'halacha according to the shita of R' Eliezer, that it is in memory of the עַנְנֵי הַכָּבוֹד and goes on to explain the reason why we celebrate Sukkot in Tishrei and not in Nisan, when we actually went out of Egypt. It is because Nisan is the beginning of the summer and people commonly sit in sukkot to escape the blazing sun during this time, so it is not distinctive that they are doing so to commemorate  יְצִיאַת מִצְרַיִם.  However, Tishrei is when the rainy season begins and not everyone is sitting in sukkot, in fact most people are indoors. So, by commemorating Sukkot in Tishrei, we are emphasizing that we are doing so specifically because HKB"H commanded us to.  

From the above, it is quite clear that we celebrate Sukkot in merit of Aharon – the עַנְנֵי הַכָּבוֹד in the Midbar were in merit of Aharon (the Mann was in Moshe's merit and the well was in Miriam's merit).

Until now, everything is clear. There is, however, one nagging inconsistency in all of this. Just prior to Sukkot, in parshat Haazinu, we read about Moshe ascending Har Nevo, preceding his death. On Simchat Torah immediately following Sukkot, in VeZot HaBracha the final parsha of the Torah, we read of Moshe's burial. 

Why do we specifically read about the death of Moshe before and after Sukkot? It is almost as if the death of Moshe "envelops" Sukkot, like the עַנְנֵי הַכָּבוֹד. What does Moshe have to do with Sukkot? Obviously, he does in some way, otherwise this proximity and structure would not exist.

In this shiur we will be exploring the shita of the Ari z"l, the Sfat Emet and R' Tzadok HaKohen of Lublin, who, each in their unique way, expound a similar principle, which appears for the first time in the Zohar. In so doing, we will hopefully acquire a unique insight into many related topics – the essence of Sukkot, the Mashiach and the Beit HaMikdash.

From a literary perspective, Moshe's story is the classic tragedy. The charismatic leader and redeemer of his people, who at the climax of the tale, never quite manages to make it to the final destination. If the Torah were a "fairy tale" (lehavdil elef havdalot), a more "appropriate" happy ending would have been. "Moses leads the Children of Israel over the Jordan river into the Promised Land, they all fade into the sunset and live happily ever after". 

In reality, the hero of our story tragically dies at the gates of Eretz Yisrael and the continuation of the story does not follow the pattern of the classic "happy end". Instead, it develops into a 3298-year saga of ups and downs that continues to this very day.

In the shiur from two weeks ago (Nitzavim 2025), we explored the idea that Mashiach is not an individual, but rather an "organism". For HKB"H to send the Mashiach and bring about the Geulah, it is not sufficient for the Mashiach (the individual) to appear, it is also necessary for the entire organism (Am Yisrael) to be in the required state of readiness.

According to the shita of the Ari z"l (שער הפסוקים, בהעלותך, סימן יב), the Sfat Emet (פרשת חקת) and R' Tzadok HaKohen (רסיסי לילה, נ"ח), which are all based on a principle brought by the Zohar (חלק כט, ואתחנן) … the Mashiach and the Geulah will only commence, when atonement is achieved for the sin of the moon on the 4th day of Creation. 

As we all know, on the 4th day HKB"H created the sun and the moon. The moon complained that it was not fitting that there be two luminaries of equal intensity in Heaven. This was the source, the origin of all machloket in the world. As a result, HKB"H told the moon to diminish itself. 

Following that, we have the sun, which radiates its own intrinsic light and the moon which does not have any intrinsic light. The light of the moon is merely a reflection of the light of the sun. Unlike the sun which is continually and fully radiant, the moon, the lunar cycle, is a fluctuating combination of alternating light and shadow. During the day the moon is eclipsed by the sun's radiance and can barely be seen.   

In the organism that is Mashiach, the individual, the redeemer, is likened to the sun and the remainder of the organism, Am Yisrael, are likened to the moon ( סנהדרין מב, א; סוכה כט, א; בראשית רבה ו, ג; שיר השירים רבה ו, י).

Let us take Moshe as an example. Moshe resembled a sun פְּנֵי מֹשֶׁה כִּפְנֵי חַמָּה (ספרי, במדבר כז, כ). The Gemara (Sota 13a) says that when Moshe was born, the house of Amram and Yocheved was filled with light. Not regular light, but a Heavenly, spiritual light, a hint of things to come. Later in his life, after Moshe descends from Har Sinai with the second set of Luchot, his face shone with a Heavenly light, קָרַן עוֹר פָּנָיו (שמות לד, כט). A light so intense that Am Yisrael could not gaze upon him unless he was wearing a veil to filter it.  

When Am Yisrael stood at Har Sinai, they achieved atonement for the sin of the moon (the essence of which was machloket), for a brief moment. By standing as one unified organism כְּאִישׁ אֶחָד בְּלֵב אֶחָד and declaring נַעֲשֶׂה וְנִשְׁמַע, Am Yisrael restored the deficient light of the moon, פְּגִימַת הַלְּבָנָה, to its original, brilliant state in Creation and thereby caused the Geulah to commence. The organism of Mashiach (Moshe and Am Yisrael) was complete. The world was "reset" to its original state when HKB"H created it, before any sin occurred. At this point Am Yisrael resembled angels אֲ‍נִי אָמַרְתִּי אֱלֹהִים (מלאכים, רש"י) אַתֶּם וּבְנֵי עֶלְיוֹן כֻּלְּכֶם (תהילים פב, ו).

This epiphany lasted only for a short time, however, because Am Yisrael were not yet ready to sustain such an intensity (תורת חיים שמות ח"ב, עמ' שצב, ב). The "vessel" was not yet resilient enough to contain such Heavenly, spiritual light. The sin of the egel, followed by the sin of the meraglim, at their core involved machloket and de facto "reawakened" the sin of the moon, thereby delaying the commencement of the Geulah.

Moshe, who was up on Har Sinai during the sin of the egel and was not part of the sin of meraglim, remained the same brilliant "sun" he was born as, until the day he died, לֹא כָהֲתָה עֵינוֹ וְלֹא נָס לֵחֹה (דברים לד, ז). Moshe was not fully "human", he is called אִישׁ הָאֱלֹהִים (דברים לג, א), which means that he was half man, half angel (דברים רבה פרשה יא סימן ד). Moshe existed in a different plane, totally removed from this physical world. This is why Moshe separated from Tzipporah. This is why Moshe could survive on Har Sinai for 40 days and 40 nights without food or water. This is how he could stroll in Heaven amongst the angels when he ascended to receive the Torah (Shabbat 88b). This is why Moshe's "gift" to Am Yisrael is the Mann, a spiritual food, the food of the angels. 

Am Yisrael, after the sins of the egel and the meraglim, remained incomplete and had to achieve tikkun - to restore the light of the moon to its original state. The only place this tikkun can occur is in Eretz Yisrael. 

Like Am Yisrael, who are compared to the moon, Eretz Yisrael operates predominantly according to the moon. The cycle of life in Eretz Yisrael revolves around the lunar cycle - the months, the chagim, the agricultural rhythms, … it is all based on the moon. Am Yisrael, in Eretz Yisrael are able to do tikkun for the sin of the moon – it is the only reality and infrastructure where this is possible. 

This, says the Ari z"l, is why Moshe could not enter Eretz Yisrael. Moshe was the sun and Eretz Yisrael with Am Yisrael in their diminished stature, are like the moon. If Moshe would have entered Eretz Yisrael then, he would have eclipsed Eretz Yisrael, like the sun eclipses the moon during daylight hours. If Am Yisrael would not have sinned with the egel and the meraglim, the organism of Mashiach would have been complete and in this state, Moshe would have been able to enter Eretz Yisrael and the Geulah would have been eternal. Instead, Am Yisrael, in their diminished state, required a leader in a diminished state to lead them into Eretz Yisrael, Yehoshua, פְּנֵי יְהוֹשֻׁעַ כִּפְנֵי לְבָנָה (ספרי, במדבר כז, כ).

In our parsha HKB"H repeats why Moshe was not allowed into Eretz Yisrael, עַל אֲשֶׁר מְעַלְתֶּם בִּי בְּתוֹךְ בְּנֵי יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּמֵי מְרִיבַת קָדֵשׁ (דברים לב, נא). We mistakenly think that it was Moshe's "sin" at Mei Meriva that prevented him from entering Eretz Yisrael, but this is not the reason, say the Ari z"l and Sfat Emet. It is because of Mei Meriva – discord and machloket within Am Yisrael, their diminished stature, like the moon, that did not make Moshe's entering Eretz Yisrael together with them possible. This is what Moshe is referring to when he says גַּם בִּי הִתְאַנַּף ה' בִּגְלַלְכֶם לֵאמֹר גַּם אַתָּה לֹא תָבֹא שָׁם (דברים א, לז), it is not something I did, it is because you, Am Yisrael, are incomplete – you do not compete the organism that is Mashiach and in this state I cannot enter Eretz Yisrael.

The purpose of the ongoing 3298-year saga is to do tikkun, to bring Am Yisrael to a state where we complete the Mashiach organism. 

A vital component of this tikkun is the chag of Sukkot.  

An interesting characteristic of Sukkot is that it is focused around "shade" and "shadow". We are all familiar with the halacha (אורח חיים תרלא, סימן א) that סְכָךְ in the sukkah has to provide more shade than sunlight, צִלָּתָהּ מְרֻבָּה מֵחַמָּתָהּ. The Zohar HaKadosh (חלק ג, קגא) refers to the sukkah as צִלָא דִּמְהֵימְנוּתָא, or in Hebrew צֵל הָאֱמוּנָה, the "shadow of faith". 

What is the significance of shade and shadow - specifically in relation to Sukkot? To understand this, we need to define what a shadow is. 

Optically speaking, a shadow, in essence, is a copy/facsimile of an object. When you shine a source of light on an object, this creates a shadow. The size and location of the shadow depend on the position of the light source relative to the object. For example, in the early morning and late afternoon when the sun tends toward the horizon, our shadow is more elongated. At noon, when the sun is directly above us, we have practically no shadow.

A shadow has no intrinsic essence - it is a "reflection" of an object. Not a clear reflection, like that in a mirror, but a pale, "distorted" reflection, a silhouette of the object. There are no details in the shadow, just outlines. This enables us to make shadows of animals, birds and other objects with our hands and fingers, because in the shadow you do not see the interior detail, just the outline. 

There are two additional interesting characteristics of shadows. They are all connected to the object at the base. When you look at your shadow, it is connected to you at your feet, not your head (unless you are standing on your head). Whenever you move, your shadow moves with you, "mimicking" your movements.

David HaMelech says that HKB"H is like our shadow. Actually, in reality, it is the opposite way round. We are like HKB"H's shadow, a pale reflection, a silhouette of the infinity that is HKB"H. We are created בְּצֶלֶם אֱ-לֹקִים, in the image of HKB"H, but not exactly like Him, not with the same detail. So, what does David HaMelech mean?

Perek קכא in Tehillim is the perek that talks about shadows (also about the sun and the moon). We are all familiar with it, all the more so now that we recite it numerous times a day when we daven for the safety of the soldiers and hostages.

שִׁיר לַמַּעֲלוֹת אֶשָּׂא עֵינַי אֶל הֶהָרִים מֵאַיִן יָבֹא עֶזְרִי. עֶזְרִי מֵעִם ה' עֹשֵׂה שָׁמַיִם וָאָרֶץ. אַל יִתֵּן לַמּוֹט רַגְלֶךָ אַל יָנוּם שֹׁמְרֶךָ. הִנֵּה לֹא יָנוּם וְלֹא יִישָׁן שׁוֹמֵר יִשְׂרָאֵל. ה' שֹׁמְרֶךָ ה' צִלְּךָ עַל יַד יְמִינֶךָ. יוֹמָם הַשֶּׁמֶשׁ לֹא יַכֶּכָּה וְיָרֵחַ בַּלָּיְלָה. ה' יִשְׁמָרְךָ מִכָּל רָע יִשְׁמֹר אֶת נַפְשֶׁךָ. ה' יִשְׁמָר צֵאתְךָ וּבוֹאֶךָ מֵעַתָּה וְעַד עוֹלָם.

When David HaMelech says ה' שֹׁמְרֶךָ ה' צִלְּךָ עַל יַד יְמִינֶךָ, HKB"H is your shadow … on your right hand, he is referring to the characteristic of shadows that they "mimic" your actions. The passuk is saying that HKB"H "mimics" whatever you do. As you behave towards Him, so He behaves toward you - but always on the right hand, the sfira of chessed, מִדַּת הָרַחֲמִים. In other words, HKB"H basically treats you like you treat Him, but not exactly – HKB"H is more biased in His reaction towards you, leaning to mercy and not מִדַּת הַדִּין. If HKB"H treated us exactly as we treated Him, we would not survive for one millisecond. 

The term used by the Zohar to describe the sukkah צִלָא דִּמְהֵימְנוּתָא, means that the Sukkah is a shadow of faith. To sit in the sukkah requires a degree of faith. We leave the comfort and security of our homes and move into a ramshackle, temporary structure that leaks, has flies, noise, that is hot/cold (depending where you are in the world), etc. We do so out of faith, that while we are there, HKB"H will protect us. The degree of faith we place in HKB"H when we move into the sukkah, is reflected/mimicked back to us by HKB"H, like a shadow. Depending whether we are uncomfortable, unhappy and constantly complaining in the sukkah, or … happy and at peace - the level of HKB"H's Shechina in our sukkah echoes that sentiment.

One interesting feature of a sukkah is that it has to have more shade than sunlight צִלָּתָהּ מְרֻבָּה מֵחַמָּתָהּ

The halacha (אורח חיים תרלא, סימן א) actually describes two situations regarding the ratio of shade to sunlight.  (A) there is more shade than sunlight (kosher סְכָךְ). (B) the sunlight and shade are equal in measure. In case B, the halacha makes a distinction according to the "height". If the shade and sunlight are equal - higher up (towards the roof of the sukkah), the סְכָךְ is passul. However, if the shade and sunlight are equal - down below (lower down from the roof) the סְכָךְ is kosher. The Shulchan Aruch explains why. Since sunlight has a tendency to disperse more than the shadow, if the sunlight and shade are equal higher up, the sunlight will disperse and when it reaches lower down, there will be more sunlight than shade. However, if the sunlight and shade are in equal measure lower down, that means that higher up there is more shade than sunlight and the סְכָךְ is kosher.

Notice a very interesting thing. We want to have more shadow than sunlight in our sukkah, because the sunlight eclipses the shadow and in a sukkah that is not a good thing. Why?

The reason is because a sukkah is tikkun for פְּגִימַת הַלְּבָנָה, the sin of the moon. The moon, in its diminished state, is typified by shadow. Similarly, the sukkah is typified by shadow - to echo the state of the moon. Just as Moshe, who is compared to sunlight, could not enter Eretz Yisrael when Am Yisrael were in their diminished state, because sunlight eclipses the moon, so too do we not want sunlight to eclipse the shadow in the sukkah, because in that state tikkun cannot be achieved. The tikkun can only be achieved when the light filling Am Yisrael and the sukkah comes from within and not from without!

Another interesting thing to note about the halachot of sukkah, is that a disproportionately large emphasis is placed on structure - dimensions and measurements. How many walls, how high each wall, the spacing between the floor and the wall, the spacing between the סְכָךְ and the wall, openings, etc. etc. The only other halachic sugya in Shulchan Aruch that resembles this "obsession" with "metrics" is תְּחוּמֵי שַׁבָּת.

When a person builds a house, the Torah and halacha do not tell you how high, how many walls, how many windows, doors, patios, slanted roof or flat roof, etc. However, when you build a sukkah, you have to adhere to a strict architectural regimen. Why?

The Mefarshim in parshat Noach ask, "Why are the psukkim so specific in the measurements of the ark? When Avraham built an Eshel in Be'er Sheva or purchased Me'arat HaMachpeila to bury Sarah, it does not state measurements of the inn or the cave!"  The answer given is that when specific measurements for a structure are given in the Torah, it is referring to a Beit HaMikdash, like the detailed structure of the Mishkan and its utensils. A structure that houses the Shechina has to have very specific measurements. Noach's ark was a floating Beit HaMikdash. 

Similarly, when such emphasis is placed on structure of the sukkah, it comes to teach us that the sukkah is a kind of a Beit HaMikdash. Just like the Shechina was present in the Beit HaMikdash, so too is the Shechina present in the sukkah (proportionally to our behavior in the sukkah, see צִלָא דִּמְהֵימְנוּתָא above).

Sometimes our shadow seems distant and disconnected from us, like in the early morning and late afternoon when the sun is low in the sky. However, at noonwhen the sun is directly overhead, our body and our shadow become one. 

This is the Beit HaMikdash. It is an umbilical bond between us and the Shechina, with no disconnect. It is impossible to distinguish between the body and the shadow. How is this achieved? Through perfect unity. When Am Yisrael achieve perfect unity within themselves, they merit achieving perfect unity with HKB"H - like at Har Sinai. This is the tikkun for the sin of the moon, which was machloket. 

The Beit HaMikdash is a beacon of unity. Every component and ritual in the Beit HaMikdash embodies unity. The twelve loaves of Lechem HaPanim on the Shulchan (Twelve Tribes). The eleven disparate ingredients in the Ketoret combining into one unified columnar pillar of smoke (atonement for the brothers selling Yosef). The Kohanim serving in the Azara resembling angels וְנותְנִים בְּאַהֲבָה רְשׁוּת זֶה לָזֶה לְהַקְדִּישׁ לְיוצְרָם בְּנַחַת רוּחַ. Am Yisrael paying pilgrimage as one, on the Shloshet HaRegalim etc. 

Similarly, the sukkah is a beacon of unity, it is called a סֻכַּת שָׁלוֹם (זוהר ח"ג, רנו א). The אַרְבַּעַת הַמִּינִים are symbol of unity between all parts of Am Yisrael. The Sfat Emet (סוכות תרס"ב) says that the passuk כָּל הָאֶזְרָח בְּיִשְׂרָאֵל יֵשְׁבוּ בַּסֻּכֹּת (ויקרא כג, מ"ב) means that all strata of Am Yisrael are eligible to sit in the sukkah, in perfect unity, despite their differences. The Gemara and the halacha lema'aseh say that the sukkah resembles the עַנְנֵי הַכָּבוֹד, which were in merit of Aharon who was a אוֹהֵב שָׁלוֹם וְרוֹדֵף שָׁלוֹם.

The Beit HaMikdash (may it be rebuilt בבי"א) and our private Beit HaMikdash, the sukkah, achieve tikkun for the sin of the moon, through unity – the antithesis of machloket, that caused the sin in the first place. This unity is the light that illuminates the sukkah from within. This is what the passuk means וְיַעֲקֹב נָסַע סֻכֹּתָה וַיִּבֶן לוֹ בָּיִת וּלְמִקְנֵהוּ עָשָׂה סֻכֹּת (בראשית לג, יז) – Yaakov built a Beit HaMikdash for Am Yisrael (as a nation) and sukkot (for each individual in Am Yisrael), to achieve tikkun on a national and private level. 

When Am Yisrael achieve tikkun for the sin of the moon, by uniting as one in service of HKB"H, then the moon will be restored to its original brilliant light and the Geulah will commence and continue for eternity.  

In that state, the sun will no longer eclipse the moon and Moshe will be able to enter Eretz Yisrael during תְּחִיַּת הַמֵּתִים.

According to the Midrash (במדבר רבה פרשה יט, יג) HKB"H said to Moshe "If you enter Eretz Yisrael now (instead of Yehoshua), the entire generation, the 600,000 that died in the Midbar, will not be resurrected when the Mashiach arrives and there is תְּחִיַּת הַמֵּתִים". Moshe chose to remain behind בְּעַרְבוֹת מוֹאָב with his flock. At the end of his life, Moshe achieved the 50th degree of טָהֳרָה and was buried on הַר נְבוֹ, or as the Mefarshim say, הַר שֶׁ-"נ"-בּוֹ. Although Moshe physically did not accompany Am Yisrael into Eretz Yisrael, the Torah that he brought down from Har Sinai did. 

When the Geulah commences, the brilliant light of the moon will be restored and the light of the sun and the light of the moon will be equivalent.  There will be perpetual light, יוֹמָא אֲרִיכְתָּא, and our shadows and bodies will be as one, we will be united with the Shechina as one.  

Then Moshe will be able to enter Eretz Yisrael, because the "sun" will no longer eclipse the "moon" and the light in and out of the sukkah will be the same, with no shadow, בְּסֻכַּת עוֹרוֹ שֶׁל לִוְיָתָן. During תְּחִיַּת הַמֵּתִים Moshe will lead all the מְתֵי מִדְבָּר back to Eretz Yisrael, together with all of Am Yisrael who died in galut ever since. 

Meanwhile, Moshe himself remains behind in galut with the מְתֵי מִדְבָּר, waiting … waiting … until Am Yisrael complete tikkun for the moon on Sukkot. Moshe remains on the "periphery" (we read about him in the Torah before and after Sukkot), enveloping Sukkot like the עַנְנֵי הַכָּבוֹד but not "entering" (except for a brief moment as one of the Ushpizin). The spirit that permeates the sukkah for the full duration of Sukkot is that of Aharon, אוֹהֵב שָׁלוֹם וְרוֹדֵף שָׁלוֹם, and the Torah of Moshe, not Moshe himself. 

לֶעָתִיד לָבוֹאboth Moshe and Aharon will be the driving force in the סֻכַּת עוֹרוֹ שֶׁל לִוְיָתָן

 

Shabbat Shalom and Chag Sameach
Eliezer Meir Saidel
Machon Lechem Hapanim
www.machonlechemhapanim.org

If you would like to dedicate a shiur in someone’s memory or for refuah, etc., please email machonlechemhapanim@gmail.com with the details.

--

Reb Ginsbourg: Remember us for Life

Our prayer to G-d during the Ten Days of Repentance is analyzed here in tribute to the victims of the Manchester terror attack For the past ...