PLEASE USE A NAME WHEN COMMENTING

05 September 2023

MK Simcha Rothman

 

'I will respect any ruling of a court bound by the law'

MK Simcha Rothman caused uproar by insinuating he would not accept the Supreme Court's ruling to reverse the reasonability standard law.

The Chairman of the Constitution Committee, MK Simcha Rothman, caused an uproar at the legal conference on the Bar Association's Judicial Selection Committee after he answered the question of whether he would respect the High Court ruling.
"I think that in a country of law everyone, but
everyone, should respect the law," Rothman said. "It will be a sad day if a judicial institution acts against the law. If the court is bound by the law, I will respect every ruling of the court that is bound by the law."

MK Rothman to INN: 'Government needs AG, I'm not sure who Baharav-Miara represents'

'My way has never been to boycott anyone; disagreements can be harsh but at the same time we can hold open discourse,' MK Simcha Rothman says.
There is no doubt that there are pretty deep ideological disagreements in our discourse," Rothman told Israel National News - Arutz Sheva. "My way was never to boycott. A place which invites me - certainly the Israel Bar Association - I will go there. When there is a desire for discourse - from my perspective this is always praiseworthy - and I hope that there will be open discourse. Disagreements can be very harsh but at the same time it's possible to hold open discourse."
Rothman was also asked whether in his opinion, Attorney General Gali Baharav-MIara should be fired for her conduct, after she submitted a legal opinion in contradiction to the opinion of the Justice Minister.
"From the Knesset, I cannot fire anyone - that is not part of my position or authority," he explained. "I definitely think that the State of Israel needs an Attorney General. As of today, I don't know who she is representing, and one of the most problematic things, in my eyes, is that she writes that she is representing the position of the public."

_________________

But the “PUBLIC” VOTED for CHANGE in the recent election. Don’t confuse her statement, interpret it to your understanding!


No comments:

馃幎诪讛 讛砖讬专 砖讛诇讞讬谉 讝拽谉 讛专讘谞讬诐 讛专讘 谞讘谞爪讗诇 诪讜诇 专讚讬驻转 诇讜诪讚讬 讛转讜专讛? 讗专讬 讛讬诇 讘住讬谞讙诇 讞讚砖 讜诪讞讝拽 诇'诇讜诪讚讬 讛转讜专讛'

  拽专讚讬讟讬诐: 讬讜讝诪讛: 讛专讘 砖诇诪讛 专注谞谉 - 讗讬讬诇转 讛砖讞专. 诇讞谉: 讘谞爪讬 砖讟讬讬谉. 诪讬诇讬诐: 专讘讬 讗讘讬讙讚讜专 谞讘谞爪讗诇 砖诇讬讟"讗. 注讬讘讜讚 讜讛驻拽讛 诪讜讝讬拽诇讬转: 讗诇讬 拽诇讬讬谉 ...