Due to Blogger Format Changes

Due to Blogger Format Changes, Posts Will Be Shortened With LINKS to ORIGINAL NO MORE ANONYMOUS COMMENTS: they will be deleted. YOU MUST USE A NAME OR MONIKER!

10 October 2019

CDC on this Year’s FLU VACCINE: -43% (minus) Effective



CDC.gov: Preliminary Estimates of 2018–19 Seasonal Influenza


jeremyrhammond  “[…] a CDC document (above) presenting the findings of their preliminary estimate, and it shows that, when it came to protecting against the H3N2 strain of the virus that predominantly circulated in the second half of the season, the vaccine appears to have been considerably less than worthless.

"Data from the "Hospitalized Adult Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network" (HAIVEN) show that the vaccine was -43% effective against influenza A(H3N2).

"This negative effectiveness was based on a small sample and not statistically significant, but the CDC conceded that its analysis of data from HAIVEN as well as two other networks "identified no vaccine protection against predominant H3N2 virus this season”.

"A negative vaccine effectiveness has been documented in a number of studies. It has been shown that getting a flu shot each year can actually increase your risk of getting the flu because you are denying yourself the opportunity to gain the much more robust immunity conferred by natural infection.

"Unlike the immunity conferred by the inactivated influenza vaccine, which targets just three or four strains of the constantly evolving influenza virus, natural immunity offers cross-protection against other strains and even other viruses.

"I explain all this in detail, with references to the scientific literature, in part three of my major influenza vaccine exposé. So in case you missed it (or just want to brush up):

The government and media systematically deceive the public about what science tells us about the risks of getting an influenza vaccine every year. jeremyrhammond  
More on Jeremy R Hammond HERE

ALSO READ THIS:

The WHO admits polio outbreak in the Philippines caused by polio vaccines… outbreak “caused by vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2”



Oral polio vaccines are actually “spawning virulent strains” of polioviruses, reports Children’s Health Defense:

The alarming surge in vaccine-derived polio cases presents vaccine planners with a “quandary” or “conundrum”—because “The very tool you are using for [polio] eradication is causing the problem.” …Vaccine researchers have long known that these OPV-derived viruses can themselves cause polio, particularly when they get “loose in the environment.”

The Associated Press story admits that it has been over 25 years since polio in the Philippines was contracted from a “wild strain.” Since 1993, all the cases of polio in the Philippines have been caused by polio vaccines

Even worse, as the AP admits, vaccines for dengue fever were actually found to increase the risk of severe dengue infections:

The government halted the dengue immunization drive after Sanofi said a study showed the vaccine may increase the risk of severe dengue infections. More than 830,000 children received the Dengvaxia vaccine under the campaign, which was launched in 2016 and halted in 2017. Sanofi officials said the Dengvaxia vaccine was safe and would reduce dengue infections if the vaccination drive continued.

Sources:
japan times
apneas
NYT: Philippines Declares Polio Outbreak After 19 Years Free of the Disease

No comments:

Rabbi Weissman: Hate Crimes According to the Torah

  When are we allowed to hate someone? When is it a mitzvah to hate someone? What is the Torah's position on "hate crimes"? Ho...