Answers to false claims regarding the R”M and Mansur Abbas Party
What are the "National aspirations" of the "National Party" and why Mansur Abbas is ready to go with the right? (google translation)
לקריאת החלק הראשון 'מה רוצה מנסור עבאס' >>
In order to understand Mansur Abbas's goals, it is necessary to understand that in contrast to the form in which they try to describe it in the media of the debate between the "southern segment" to "Northern Depression" is not ideological, the long-term goals of the southern level is identical to this of the north, and the selection of the South Stream To enter the Knesset elections, and act in non-Islamic democratic framework, did not bring him for a moment to stop working for the purpose he was established. In fact, according to the leaders of the "Southern Peg(?)" leaders who approved the department of the Islamic Movement in the Knesset at the Knesset in a conference in Turkey, he is Yusuf to the informal leader of the Muslim Brotherhood movements, reminded that El (?) supported Hamas's suicide attacks, and stopped that every Jew is a legitimate goal for "resistance."
Even after the distrust of the Islamic movement, members of the South Stream continued to support all the way in the armed struggle in Israel. In three ways: Support for terrorists sitting in prisons - as proved the heads of the movement in the past, and Abu Daves today participated and regularly participated in supporting events in Arab-Israeli terrorists, also Mansur Abbas himself participated in his previous position as a vice chairman of the movement in the journey of families on the occasion of "Day The prisoner, "in the transaction of Shalit operated the Islamic movement to create pressure on Hamas to include the terrorists with the Israeli identity card in the liberated list.
On the second plane, the movement operates through its ties with the terrorist organization in Gaza, in the article, which published by Mansur Abbas, he praised the "Instant Hamas Convention" published in 2017, which defines the completion of the assassination of the occupation in the first stage, and then the liberation of all Palestine. The chairman of the movement wrote Abu Davas written by Hamas on the successful operation of Shalit. In addition to active members of the movement in various attempts to reconciliation initiatives between Fatah movement and Hamas, Mansur Abbas traveled himself to Katar in 2016 to mediate between Hamas and Fatah. And in the third level in the incitement "Al-Quds is dazzling the Islamic nation to extract her from Kabashiyeh"
To explain what Mansur Abbas wants, we will begin to relate to 3 false claims that were distributed by interests in connection with the (?) and Mansur Abbas Party, and explain his intentions, in the third part of the series I will try to relate to the deeper side, also the illusion of the "changing" Israeli Arabs, and also set not only what depressions, but some cooperation is possible.
The first argument: a remembrance party did "change" and decided the benefit of the Hebrew public is better to engage only in "civilian discourse."
This argument will answer two stages.
In the first stage we will talk about the southern side of the Islamic movement, which chose to cope for the Knesset elections and shown by the researchers as "inline" in the State of Israel. In the study we have proved in dozens of evidence that some were published in the media that the debate between the "Northern Peg" is mainly regarding the tactic, and throughout the way they continued to report to the side of the Hamas, supporting Arabic terrorists, and see the Zionism of a racist and cansite project, and lead to The struggle at the Temple Mount and nationalist rhetoric.
Among the most prominent things, we have seen is how the Islamic terrorist organizations are strengthened, the Islamic movement here in Israel are raising a head, so during the second Intifada In the "Maramara to Gaza" flotilla and events to mark the release of Bedouin terrorists during the second intifada and released at the beginning of the previous decade, while the Shalit transaction operated representatives of the Knesset movement in the Hamas to include the release of Israeli citizens, and after the success of the deal published yo The movement "Abu (?)" an article that praised Hamas' historical achievement, and his insistence on the liberation of terrorists, and at the end of the Palestinian Authority, the Palestinian Authority must be established to bring the Hamas terrorist organization to lead the Palestinian Authority.
In fact, the Islamic movement behind the Raza Party sees its role in the National Court of National:
1. Preserving Al Aqsa, and in a struggle in the presence of the Jews on the Temple Mount and strengthening the Muslim presence in Jerusalem
2. Saving and strengthening the Palestinian and Islamic identity of the Israeli Arabs left after the "Really" through educational and social activity
3. Maintaining the status of Islamic movement as the process between the Palestinian Authority (Fatah) to Hamas.
4. Use of the "neutral" position of the Islamic movement in order to support prisoners. And apart from the vision of Islamic movement to build the company Arabic as an independent force, cohesive and formulating the national and religious identity of the "Israeli Arabs" through the novisters of the movement.
Mansur Abbas also (the current chairman of the (?) political party of the Islamic movement
In his various functioning in the movement, and especially in the framework of his role as Chairman Abu (?) was (and was still involved in the national activity of the movement). If it is participating in the agitation of the terrorist families, in the home mountain activity, and especially around the riots of magnotherarm, with a special trip to the reconciliation efforts Between Fatah and Hamas, and in articles published by Hamas, praise the "updated faithful" and the completeness of Hamas's resistance as long as it is not planned to innocent people, in dozens of posts in Arabic, Mansur Abbas and emphasizes his commitment to the Palestinian cause. (For additional detail dozens of evidence of their nationalist-Palestinian activities of remarkable members can be seen in the thread I did on Twitter, or contact me in private).
In the second stage, we must address the claim (even if it is ridiculous) that all the things we published about the RAAM movement are old and that in the past year Mansour Abbas has made a change. We will explain this: the RAAM party is not an independent party, but part of a hierarchical and orderly movement. Is the movement's success in calculating the votes it will receive by less than a thousand votes! An amazing statistic that illustrates the organized and hierarchical structure of the movement, and its ability to control) Mansour Abbas' decision was backed by members of the movement, including those who are less exposed to public criticism. In the most extreme nationalist discourse and in support of terrorists (such as Chachal Tzarzur who participated in the celebrations of the assassination of soldier Moshe Tamam the 4th, former MK Dahmash, the movement's leader Abu Deabs and more) - the Negro did not turn his skin for a moment, but is part of an orderly mishnah Which has been formulated in the last three years under the leadership of the Islamic movement, which is full of "Taqiya" - deception
In fact, already after the release of the movement's founder Nimer Darwish, he realized that he had no ability to hold a movement that would operate in the spirit of the "Muslim Brotherhood" to build a society founded on the foundations of Islam, while jihadist, so he announced that the movement would operate under the law. From Kfar Qassem, Nimer Darwish "ruled" in accordance with Islamic practice that peace should not be made with "infidels", but only a long-term ceasefire (the "hudna" known from contacts with Hamas) that such a ceasefire may be called "peace". Nimer Darwish did not change his worldview, or his commitment to the ideas of the Muslim Brotherhood, but acted according to the "work plan" of the Muslim Brotherhood movements.
Another important point to understand, Mansour Abbas did not invent the idea to go with the "right" in the last election, in fact it is a move he has been promoting since taking office as chairman of the RAM party and has been in power since he served as deputy chairman of the Islamic Movement. He addresses his friends on the joint list in 2018 and tells them: You have decided that you only cooperate with "non-Zionist" lists, but I want to wonder about the definition of who is "Zionist", and in my opinion, anyone who is not willing to pack his belongings and return to Europe is Zionist, so You, too, in fact, are cooperating with Zionism.
The realization that the right is in power and will remain in power in the coming years has led the RAAM movement and especially Mansour Abbas to wonder about the effectiveness of the automatic commitment of the Arab parties to the left, which has rendered them irrelevant. Finally rejected by Gantz's refusal to form a government with the Arabs, it strengthened the understanding of the RAAM members that a "new method" should be invented - one that would allow the power of the "Arab minority" to be built as an independent force - independent of the left. ) And not on the right (as Likud members think), and to strengthen the power of the Islamic movement in the Arab street, as the dominant and controlling force, as the movement strives to do in every country in the world.
Throughout the election campaign, Mansour Abbas' campaigns in Arabic promised that his votes and activities in the Palestinian cause had not changed, and that all the disagreement between him and the joint list was only about how to manage the "civilian" claims of Israeli Arabs.
The second claim: The RAAM party was influenced by the "Abraham agreements" with the United Arab Emirates, which proved that there could be a peace agreement between Muslims who would recognize the State of Israel as a Jewish, proud and even "right-wing" state.
This claim in the apology is based on complete ignorance, although the "Abrahamic Agreements" are not perfect and do not really express "Gaon Yaakov", but the Ra'am Party - the Muslim Brotherhood branch expresses a completely different end of the Hebrew political / social map, in fact in Arabic The Islamists condemned the agreements with the UAE which they called "arms trade between the Emirates and American imperialism", and issued a special statement of condemnation of the UAE declaring the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. The Muslim Brotherhood organizations, whose main strength is in Turkey and Qatar, is the reason that pushed them to normalize with Israel.
The third argument - if the demands of the RAAM party are only civil and not national, it is no problem to give them these demands in exchange for support for a right-wing government.
This claim that I will expand on in the third part should simply answer "there is no civil discourse that is not a national discourse", the truth is that this is not my sentence, but that of Walid Taha at the Baqa al-Gharbiya election conference, which was the slogan in the PM's election campaign. The Ra'am party is talking about it, whose power base is in the Negev, it is the claims on the land - in the Negev and the Galilee, it is the denial of the possibility of the Jewish state of Shlamor over a majority of Jews in the Negev or the Galilee.
An example is given: When the State of Israel previously wanted to work for the Judaization of the Galilee to preserve the existing minimum Jewish majority in the Galilee, it initiated an expectation plan, or designated land for Jewish cities in Wadi Ara, as part of the "civil discourse" these tenders will be directed to another Arab city. The "harvest" lands will be transferred to "Mushrifa", or in fact it will be possible to close the "Regavim movement" and forget about most Jews in the Negev and Galilee, and given the intensification of the Islamic movement, the power the ruling party, the Negev and the Galilee will become
A clear example of the "civil discourse" to which we have been exposed in recent days is the activity of members of the Islamic movement in Jaffa, the struggle against the Torah nucleus in a discourse against "expulsion of Arabs from Jaffa". To fight Jewish sovereignty in Jaffa.
So why is Mansour Abbas willing to go with the right? Abbas has said this many times: Ideologically I have no difference between the Zionist left and the Zionist right, because Zionism itself is the crime, at many conferences Mansour Abbas mentioned that the left is the one that initiated the "Nakba" and led the military administration, a recommendation for Netanyahu or a recommendation for Ganz Both are ideological concessions for him. What Abbas says is that in the current situation (which Mansour Abbas sees as temporary), the Arabs have the power to pose no scales and thus "squeeze" the government into the same matters that he can wrap up in the framework
Unlike the secular Arab parties (mainly Hadash and Balad) whose participation in the democratic game is partly sincere and the purpose of their entry into the Knesset is to advance the agenda they represent. The RAAM party does not believe in the Knesset as a tool for change, on the contrary, RAAM promotes its perception with the help of building an independent Arab force, and independent with the help of the dozens of associations it owns, and the power building of a cohesive and organized Arab-Islamic society.
For this reason it is different from Hadash and Balad
Mansour Abbas does not see the Knesset as a place where he wants to express his views, or needs to say what he thinks, he keeps the ideology to the extensive activities of the Islamic movement and its metastases in the Arab street, the Knesset is a platform to promote the affairs of the Islamic movement, strengthen its position in the Arab street. And place the Islamic movement led by Israeli Arabs.
Depending on the activities of the "Muslim Brotherhood" in all the countries in which it operates, the use of the political sphere and integration into parliamentary activities or governmental frameworks, are intended to serve the goals of segregation, and the formation of independent identity.
Another point related to the internal development of the Arab street - the intensification of the Islamic movement (on two factions) in the Arab street in recent years, has led the leaders of the Islamic movement to understand that the movement's power is greater than the representation it gained in the joint list led by the Communists - Ayman Odeh Mansour Abbas opposed the revolutionary plan of action outlined by Ayman Odeh - which was based on an attempt to build a "common civic denominator" together with parties he calls "Zionist-lite". In the Islamic conception such an alliance - based on liberal values is wrong, so Mansour Abbas recognized an opportunity to succeed and capture the leadership of Israeli Arabs, and rather advance his conception - strengthening the Arab-Palestinian identity of Israeli Arabs as an independent and independent force, in this sense Mansour Abbas today - The battle for control of the Arab street is a preparation for the next stage: the realization of the Islamic Movement's vision.
